570 karma · joined August 28, 2013
The hard part is creating a tool that can change between styles. Such a tool would need to be made for every language separately which is a pain. I've been wanting to try something like this for years but have never built up the courage.
Another way to put it is, learning the postulates for langx doesn't provide enough value for many to be worth doing.
I doubt anyone reasonable even claims that a perfect society is possible - someone will always feel wronged regardless of their circumstance. I don't think it's unfair to say that the main function of a society is to reduce the likelihood that a person of said society gets wronged. Which brings the question of how does a society do that without enforcement of laws? If we accept the NAP is a law, who reprimands those who break it? Who actually defines what it is in the first place? Undoubtedly there are many different interpretations of it and it's not possible to achieve a feeling of fairness in a society if not everyone agrees on its basic structure and laws. If you feel like these are too basic of questions, feel free to link me to what you would consider a definitive explanation.
v(1) = 6
v(2) = 11
v(3) = v(1) + v(2) = 17
In general sequences, especially short ones, can have many ways to be generated, but I imagine this is the one the GP meant.
A good friend of mine is an anarcho-capitalist and while he is overall a very technical, very logical, and generally smart person, neither of us have managed to convince the other that their view-point is flawed. It's rather frustrating.
Things like protecting weaker parties through a court system, providing national infrastructure for the economic prosperity of everyone (as opposed to private infrastructure for the prosperity of few), national defense, food and water regulation, base level research and development, protection from criminals, corporate regulation, are only a few that immediately come to mind.
Not everything needs to be pigeonholed into the "must make perfect sense" category.
In either case, no reason to be negative. If you don't like it, don't use it. If you are commenting to critique, no reason to be a jerk.