HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

mfnex

15 karma · joined December 31, 2019

submissionscomments
mfnex··on Should religious AI chatbots be treated differently from all others?
Sure, but Barnes only meant the Catholic faith. There are faiths of all kinds.
mfnex··on Ask HN: Could you share your personal blog here?
Since 2007, https://stop.zona-m.net/

now also as newsletter, https://mfioretti.substack.com/

mfnex··on With all social media fucking up severely, what's next?
Q: what now?

A: RSS of course. Seriously. See https://stop.zona-m.net/2019/09/rss-is-still-great.-and-need...

Pick your sources, COMPLAIN if they do not publish an RSS feeds, and read "news" including posts from personal blogs, through an aggregator. At YOUR pace, without tracking and pushing.

While we are at this, wy/how is Twitch "completely unusable" ?h Just curious, really.

mfnex··on What is the A.I.’s existential threat to humanity?
Q: "What is the A.I.’s existential threat to humanity?"

A: a scam. The existential threat is us, see https://mfioretti.substack.com/p/you-are-all-getting-this-st...

mfnex··on Ask HN: How accurate is flatkill.org now?
Too many packaging formats are evil: https://stop.zona-m.net/2022/01/the-sorry-sorry-state-of-lin...
mfnex··on Will AI Kill Us?
AI will *directly* kill us only if we are so STUPID to basically BEG it do it. There are many more reasons why AI is really dangerous, but only through our ignorance. I explained what I mean in a much longer answer to this very question that I published 2 weeks ago:

https://mfioretti.substack.com/p/you-are-all-getting-this-st...

mfnex··on Ask HN: Online Banking in Europe Without Smartphone
Italy here.

At least 2/3 major banks still allow full use of online banking from desktop computers, and at least in one case I know for sure it's 100% Linux compatible. You ALSO need the hardware thingy that generates new numeric codes every time you push its button, to get an authorization code to e.g. make payments. But no smartphone

mfnex··on Ask HN: Is Instagram “Dying”?
read my comment again. It was not my choice. The people I mentioned were/are only on Twitter, it is either endure their non-work drivel on Twitter, or lose everything they say.

Above all, what I report is just an example of a general problem anyway. If they were only on LinkedIn, and mixing one work-related post every 50 about what cocktail they had last Saturday, what would "wanting LinkedIn, not Twitter, change"?

mfnex··on Ask HN: Is Instagram “Dying”?
"You'd be able to compartmentalize whatever content you choose to put out."

I wish this were mandatory.

On Twitter, when it still made sense to use it (no, it's not about Musk, it sucked by shadowbanning almost everybody who wouldn't pay well before Musk came), several people whom I should really follow for my work basically FORCED ME TO UNFOLLOW THEM, because:

- their work-related tweets were ACTUALLY important for MY job (papers they published, slides from their talks, professional conversations...)

- but they buried them under garbage, meaning every work tweet was lost in 20/30 other tweets about food porn, what movie they were watching, what shirt they got for Christmas, and tons of other totally personal, totally irrelevant shit that was impossible to filter out, all coming as one stream

No matter how relevant their work tweet were, extracting them from that endless drivel just was not worth the time.

mfnex··on Ask HN: Can you sign up for Instagram using Firefox?
no idea, but following because I have exactly the same need...
mfnex··on The Case Against A.I
Argument 1: it's NOT intelligence. Not by any meaningful definition, at least.
mfnex··on Bing vs. Google: the new AI-driven search wars are on
"For the first time this century, @Google is facing a serious threat to its search domination with the #ChatGPT and @Bing combination"

Me, I fear what is facing a serious threat is USEFUL online search...

mfnex··on What's better for newsletter+blog? Substack or Beehiiv?
Thanks, but the same question as for Substack and Beehiiv remain, see points 3 and 4 of my original post.

I already have a blog, want to keep it online as it is, and I have no problem writing with my current editor software. What I am looking for is a way to publish NEW content FROM NOW ON:

1. FIRST as newsletter, with its own associated blog. Just because that seems the only medium left that people who do read a whole article still tolerate

2. THEN, 1/2 week a post has been published there, migrate it out of that platform and into my existing blog, leaving in the platform just a "This post migrated here, just click" notice. Because that's the only way to guarantee that that content lives as long as possible, always at the same URL.

mfnex··on What's better for newsletter+blog? Substack or Beehiiv?
thanks, but as I wrote in the OP Beehiiv does not pass points 1-2 there.

Still, I may use it if it turns out that Beehiv does allow points 3 and 4 of the same post. Do you know what the answer to them is?

Thx

mfnex··on What's better for newsletter+blog? Substack or Beehiiv?
thanks to everybody who answered, but here is some more info that hopefully make my question clearer:

I ALREADY have a blog, with plenty of content. If enough people saw it and told me "it sucks, just stop", I would accept it, nobody owns me anything. BUT...

The reason to look for a newsletter is that as things stand now, I have plenty of proofs that almost nobody ever gets to even *see* it. THAT is the problem I need to solve.

It's the fact that these days:

1: almost nobody uses RSS, because they're sincerely convinced that "it stopped working when Google killed Reader" (I've lost count of how many times I've heard this specific bit of falsehood)

2: on social media, almost nobody bothers to click and read the conclusion of any article at its original URL. And I can't stand anymore having to give answers like "please note that the third paragraph of this post that I shared explicitly answers what you just asked"

3: point 2) would not change at all by switching to another CMS

4: points 2 and 3 are irrelevant anyway because Twitter, FB etc... just shadowban whoever does not pay them. As I say, I have plenty of proofs that almost nobody ever gets to SEE what I post there. Even stuff that should surely get through, e.g. polite notification that there was a typo in a post, or requests to provide further reading on some topic

Summarizing, if the only way left these days to be sure that people do SEE AND READ all I wrote from top to bottom, at least once or two is a newsletter... so be it. But it has to be something optimized for "newslettering", that facilitates as much as possible to find subscribers, and SURELY allows points 3 and 4 of my original question. So what about them?

Thx