1,536 karma · joined October 2, 2013
irc:mixologic:irc
A service, running on somebody else's machine, is essntially closed.
I think the only way to have an 'open' service is to have it managed like a co-op, where the users all have access to deployment logs or other such transparency.
Even then, it requires implicit trust in whomever has the authorization to access the servers.
It's still astonishing to me that people think that open source somehow has any bearing on the issue of:
> Nobody can say what the server is doing nor what it is harvesting which could be very dangerous.
Thats still true, whether its running open source software or not. You cannot inspect the running code on a server, except, now you have to trust a whole federated mob of servers.
But, what the pollsters got crazy wrong, was Trumps polling numbers, by wide margins, far outside the margin of error.
I think they got it wrong this time too, and I think it all comes down to their methodology for actually getting a random sample of voters. Many polls are still married to live interviews and also to landline contact, and also tied to live interview polling - I think there is a partisan slant that they are not accounting for that includes a "propensity to answer a polling survey in the first place"
... And nuclear power is a simple matter of splitting atoms.
Im all for the decriminalization and legalization of psilocybin mushrooms, but you're not doing that movement any favors saying "It's not a recreational party drug" When they have historically been called Magic mushrooms.
The key thing is to challenge every elected official who claims thing like "This is a bald-faced attempt to just make these very serious, very potent, very dangerous—both short-term and long-term—hallucinogenic drugs broadly available"
What evidence do you have that they are dangerous?
I don't think we're far away from court ordered wire taps to compel Google to enable the cameras and microphones.
```Canna_Bars, on Hansa, advertised pounds of methamphetamine. In the description of the product, Porras had claimed the methamphetamine came “direct from Mexico.”```
So, defintely not legal anywhere, nor is mass distribution of meth really something that is of benefit to anybody but the cartels he bought it from.
As a learning resource, it is a complete waste of time for trying to build a hackintosh.
It might seem complex, and obtuse, but its turtles all the way down, and everything all the way back to to the original von Neumann architecture could definitely be looked at again and redesigned, but otoh, we're still doing weird shit like dividing our day into 24 hours and 60 minutes and 60 seconds for no other reason than 'its always been that way' and if we had a chance to actually design a sensible time system we could eliminate a lot of the complexity that has piled up on top of that system.
But yeah, no way would I ever want to go back to the way things were before all these layers existed.
Disabling telemetry by default ended up harming the users of those distributions by making their usage of ALSA invisible. Again, that choice by the distro maintainers isn't something that Mozilla had any control over. Voluntarily withholding telemetry data is similar to abstaining from an election. You dont get to complain about who got elected if you didn't vote, likewise you dont get to complain about lack of support for your use cases if you don't allow upstream projects to know that you have them.
Services are not free (as in beer) - they always take time, money, and labor to provide. A PkgServer.jl is exactly the kind of thing that has to be sustained somehow.
It's not possible to use a networked service without exchanging some information with that service, which may or may not be useful for the service providers to collect, so that they can provide a better service (Read: make it cost less)
The idea that one should be entitled to use a service, for free, and at the same time ask that the service does not collect any data, or make it opt-in by default, is akin to demanding free beer that people can optionally pay for.
Caveat: My bias is from being a service provider for a packaging endpoint, a security updates endpoint, and a community CI service. Any telemetry data we can get our hands on to help us make informed decisions about what to support, and what to drop support is absolutely invaluable.