2,335 karma · joined November 13, 2011
After that you need to factor in your time as the flipper (time to do the purchase analysis, acquire the property, fixup the property, market the property, sell the property). Ultimately for flippers a 15% spread between purchase and sale would usually be a sizeable loss
Just the difference in your housing costs (about 30k after taxes) wipe out your salary increase. On top of that it sounds like you'd be losing a 2nd income as well by moving so it looks like a net loss. On top of that other things in the area are going to be some what more costly.
1) The difference between the mortgage payment and equivalent rent for an equivalent place
2) Tax write offs (mortgage interest deductions)
3) Principal pay down
4) Property Maintenance costs
5) Property purchase fees (transfer tax, loan origination fees, etc)
And then for the stock holder you missed...
6) Taxes paid on cashing out stocks
In any sort of leadership role you're supposed to be trying to extract the best work from your people. Generally you are not going to be able to do that effectively if you are looking down on them. Give them a bit of respect, encourage incentives and comaraderie. Your new job is to be explaining stuff to them so they can work better. If you don't like them figure out how to make them better - its usually easier and way less expensive than firing and hiring.
Im not sure why in this situation you would not consult with an attorney to explore your legal options? Consulting with an attorney and at least initially engaging in a legal discourse with your previous employer is really not that expensive and many times if you have a viable case the legal costs are paid only by a successful settlement. Im not sure what she has to lose here besides seeing if she can get a lawyer to take it on contingency and time documenting the damages.
My honest guess is that IF she has documentation, having an attorney engage Uber would just result in some form of settlement to not have it go into court.
After iontophoresis I actually can't sweat from my hands (unless I get lazy about maintaining my treatments). This basically feels like a miracle if you have this condition. Iontophoresis is also very safe and very well proven for hyperhidrosis where I have concerns about the long term effects of some of the other treatments. You can also do the same treatment for your feet (I have it on my feet as well but it doesn't impact my day to day enough to do treatment.)
(Also Id caution against ETS. Go onto a hyperhidrosis forum and there are a very large number of people who had ETS that strongly advise against having the surgery)
In most companies, company provided computers are or can be heavily monitored with the flip of a switch. Anything you potentially do could be used against you in a review or change in relationship with the company. Not only that but an employer can lay claim to anything you do being that it is their property your using <- this one even applies in California.
Im usually a cheap ass but on this one spend the money.
Id bet there will be 2 buckets that things fall into ...
1) Added connectivity that makes the core functionality better (ex. thermostat that can forecast the temperature for the next 2 hours to improve AC costs)
2) Connectivity that is tacked on as a gimmick that doesn't actually improve what the thing is made for in the first place (ex. microwave that texts you when its done)
In the long term I think only category 1 will remain in the IoT world. From my consumer perspective most things around my house fall into bucket #2 - All I want is for that thing to do what its meant to do best which usually doesn't involve being able to talk to anything.
- Anyone over 40
- Anyone who doesn't fit the profile of a 25 year old white male
Until this happens in any real manner, these sort of pleas are just politics as usual for economic gain.
If $200 is par for the course and there is no real explanation as to why, Id personally start packing my bags in that it likely indicates that they either... like to bait and switch on employees and don't care about morale or they are in the hole financially.
I personally have seen a lot of bait and switch to get people in the door in the startup world and from my experience its usually a sign that your going to be a glutton for punishment more or less.
Your story is the equivalent of wondering if you'll be prosecuted for grand theft for taking 2 samples at the grocery store instead of 1.
1st death march managers promised bonuses, extra days off, etc etc for working overtime. Everyone went above and beyond to get things done after which all promises were forgotten
2nd and 3rd death marches I nodded my head while putting in as few hours of work as possible per day. I think others did the same in their own way. In my own mind I figured payment was due from the first go around and they were going to pay whether they realized it or not.
The problem I think is that in these general scenarios management is acting unethically and the dumbest practical thing you can do is to point out their ethical gaps when they are well aware of what they are doing. So I think you ultimately have 3 choices... you either 1) just quit 2) battle their unethical behavior with your own counter unethical behavior or 3) go along with it all (worst of all 3!)
Lastly the way that job ended was that the whole company toppled due to financial problems so in my experience that sort of behavior from management is usually an indicator of a company in collapse.
$1 - A can and a piece of cardboard to use to beg for money
$10 - A spray bottle and rag to wash cars with
$100 - A book
$1,000 - A few classes at community college
$10,000 - A really cheap degree of some sort
$100,000 - Index funds
$1,000,000 - Rental property