nilved

The title isn't "don't overuse black," it's "never use black." Black is an unappealing colour to look at.

Everything about this is stupid.

From that description it sounds nightmarish.

That's "professional associations" for you

> Disclaimer: I work for AWS, but my opinions are my own.

> I don't think you have much to worry about if you're a WF employee. Amazon actually treats their employees very well.

Normally when people say Amazon abuses their employees, they aren't talking about AWS.

Yeah, flag this title. It's not even clickbait, it's just a lie.

Safari uses different cookie jars for each private tab. Chrome uses different jars for each private window. (I believe.)

Very true, but you can start with the egregious violations such as AMP.

A browser extension could be made pretty easily. If you have a terminal open, do `echo mymasterpassword facebook.com | shasum -a 256 | pbcopy`.

That makes no sense. You use a password manager so you don't need to manage the passwords. If you don't like the concept of having passwords at all then use a stateless, hash-based password generator instead.

That connotation seems obvious but I didn't pick up on it until months after I heard about CockroachDB. For one, a minority of people who know about cockroaches know about their resilience. For two, people who _do_ know that still know that cockroaches are disgusting. The reptile brain is going to react with revulsion even if the higher brain finds the metaphor.

No it isn't. Does your web browser do more than browse web pages? Then it's bloated. When you can log in your browser, start asking questions.

Firefox is just as bloated but at least it's extensible (for now.) Web "extensions" are Firefox' suicide.

I am gonna dispute that. Chrome is bloated and inextensible​.

That's a shame. Everything on drop-dropbox.com still applies.

Did you report that?

Don't you remember io.js?

CDNs are a lie. The privacy implications outweigh the performance benefits since there are many, many, many CDNs and many, many versions of jQuery. It's rare for users to benefit from caching.

> Yeah. Except you need to do Ajax and fetch doesn't cut it. So new lib.

Ah, so this is how front-end got the way it is.

What a dumb comment. "A day without JavaScript" is to websites as "A day without a CPU" is to paper books. Documents are not software.

Kind of funny that I got -4 for that comment when literally every comment in the thread says the same thing about this nameless company.

Thanks for bringing that to my attention! That's fantastic and I think they should put more focus on this option on the homepage.

edit: was wrong, see replies.

Is The Aluminum Hypothesis Dead? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4131942/

> Prisons need to safely and securely provide accommodation for "high-risk, high-need" human beings to survive and be rehabilitated.

lmao

Well, that's one part of it.

Like, why should I even click the link?

No, my claim is simply that NIST sponsorship is not a good reason to use it.

> The reality is that you should use SHA-3. I'm making this as a broad recommendation for people who do not know much about cryptography. You can't go wrong with the NIST's standard.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_EC_DRBG