It seems the opposite: toil makes us human. Our inability to accept what can be foraged has pushed us into working.
349 karma · joined April 15, 2015
It seems the opposite: toil makes us human. Our inability to accept what can be foraged has pushed us into working.
https://clonk.me/nft/137/0x8abd8d9fab3f711b16d15ce48747db496...
If we could eat different things, we could give up agriculture and save a bunch of land and energy.
Remote: Yes
Willing to Relocate: Yes
Technologies: Solidity, Javascript, HTML, CSS
Resume: http://latenightsketches.com/resume-benjamin-green.pdf or https://numtel.github.io/
Email: ben@latenightsketches.com
Hello, I'm a full stack developer interested in building EVM dApps. See my portfolio site for links to my previous work. I'm especially interested in projects using Proof of Personhood or Sybil resistance.
The article doesn't go into how they would limit users from creating new accounts, (i.e. sybil resistance) which would be very important if you give out points like this.
> Every 10 minutes, the system slightly reallocates points.
The article author does not make any comparisons of their calculation to a reddit/hackernews style calculation, which already does has this kind of effect. See this article [0] or my Javascript implementation [1]
I made a reddit clone [2] that kind of follows this principal: Anyone can make a board which has its own ERC20 token. Upvoting/downvoting costs 1 token. Upvotes tokens are sent to the message author. Downvotes are burned. Moderators have the ability to mint new tokens. I figured these tokens could become valuable if there were lots of discussions in a board since it would induce a demand to moderate the board.
I also made a different site [3] that changes the decentralized moderation system so that instead of democratic upvotes, the message owner gets absolute discretion over the sorting of the replies they receive. I've put much more work into this one so it works much better.
[0] https://www.evanmiller.org/how-not-to-sort-by-average-rating...
[1] https://github.com/numtel/piece-chat/blob/main/src/component...
[2] https://glasshalf.chat/ (Optimism) or https://nonphysical.systems/ (Polygon Mumbai)
Good thing California is saving us from the sexual nature of GitHub's mascot.
I believe there's other requirements for BSC validators too, like staking a bunch of BNB.
I see it as a massive bet on storage prices continuing to decrease.
Every public blockchain works this way afaik. I've even made a site for hosting webpages on Optimism: https://newgeocities.com
The real discussion imo is that blockchain node operators should be pressured to respond to concerns about unwanted content. There's no reason they can't coordinate on filters in the same way Ethereum validators use Flashbots to ignore Tornado Cash transactions. Although I hope they can find a better solution than blocking entire contracts because it's really nice to write a simple contract for data storage. Remember: a contract is a protocol, not a program. The validators follow the instructions but it's more like a database schema to which people submit conforming messages. As the contract creator, you're just publishing your code on chain. Each user takes responsibility for their own data.
A shark hunting is over the line but it can look for fish fine?
At least cars have smog equipment to reduce the emissions. Motorcycles mostly don't.
Last year for the ETHOnline hackathon, I made an app that allows anyone to request a loan in any erc20 token with (optional) collateral in any set of erc20s. In addition, the borrower identity is used to increase confidence: a linked Lens profile and/or verified passport using Coinpassport. The principal is then crowdfunded. [2]
While making this, I learned that Aave was originally called ETHLend and followed a similar model of requesting individual loans but this approach makes it difficult to attract liquidity so when they developed over-collateralized pools, the protocol became much more popular.
It's going to take better identity tools than we currently have. Of course, undercollatorized lending is the basis of traditional banking so replicating it on chain is a massive win for the ecosystem.
There's a few projects working on credit scores on chain: Sprectral [3] and Cred protocol. See this article about using Cred protocol [4]
[1] https://jumpcrypto.com/writing/paradigms-for-on-chain-credit...
[2] https://ethglobal.com/showcase/lwned-75x0f
[3] https://www.spectral.finance/
[4] https://medium.com/chelo-finance/chelo-tech-guide-2-uncollat...
I believe the word you're looking for is 'bollard'.
Apparently at the time, the largest was the organ from the 1904 world's fair in St. louis
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_Foods
Out of Berkeley, there's also Air Protein
And don't reply with a link to that japanese guy who sells his time to hang out.
Oh no, we're on course to make a coin with Trump's face on it.
I don't know the author's reasoning since it's not included but IMO, a greater population is valuable because it means more ideas and more chances for diversity. (especially with the vast distances of space)
Of course, this reasoning and I'm pretty sure your views resonate with the famous Stephen J. Gould quote:
> I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.
OTOH, I didn't realize until I got in there that there's only like 3 parts in a water heater so it wasn't as complicated as I imagined but I didn't have its breadth of knowledge.
James C Scott chronicles in his various books about how most people do what they can to avoid top-down control. Before such weapons of coercion, it would have been much more difficult to enforce the hierarchies suggested by industrialization.
Without any plugins, chatgpt will happily return sha hashes and salts when I asked it to play rock paper scissors this was. The only trouble was, the hashes were totally wrong.