1,785 karma · joined October 14, 2015
Another option might be the delegation of responsibility to the voting population to force a timely resolution of the election, greater understanding of the issues at hand, etc.
For example, voters would be allowed to put the status of any and all candidates as null and/or a top vote as null. If the majority of votes cast as were null, another election would be run with all candidates from the prior election removed.
Have links to these studies?
If so, is this illegal, and if not, why?
I don't know Moxie, but we've exchange messages before and never got the sense that off the cuff he was discounting any feedback. At a very highly level we agree about what he's doing, though I get the sense that anonymity is something we don't exactly agree about, but do understand a little of why he feels the way he does.
>> ""F-Droid has received criticism for distributing out-of-date versions of official applications and for its approach to application signing."
Curious if he'll comment on what happened:
https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=moxie
___
If you don't know about Moxie, highly suggest learning more about him:
Citric Acid will eat metal, which is why liquids like orange and lime juice are not stored in metal containers.
AMD'd links never redirect, if you click the X you're sent back to Google's results, there's no way to get to the real URL that an average user would easily be able to do, if the link is bookmarked the link it's not the real link, etc.
There should be a way to opt-out that is simple and does not require the user to be signed-in to do.
Ironically, almost positive that Google hates when links are wrapped like this.
Given this is in fact the source code that the developer in question has admitted was the basis for their code, it would be interesting to know if they were correctly using the MIT License here: https://github.com/codevise/pageflow/blob/master/MIT-LICENSE
Congress would review the proposals and select the winner and provide the budget needed.
Honestly at this point, strongly feel there needs to be a agency explicitly responsible for commercializing space - and neither FAA or NASA have a track record of doing this.
It's clearly stated that the US military is still going to be the primary source for the data.
Why not have an open RFP that anyone is able to provide a proposal and if the a existing agency doesn't win, make it independently run?
What is need is a mainstream movement to embrace crypto as a fundamental human right.
____________
Sidebar: The article is part of "Passcode" - a field guide to security and privacy from The Christian Science Monitor: http://passcode.csmonitor.com
There is a long list of "murders" that were found not guilty after being executed: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrongful_execution
Beyond that, some confessed murders go on to contribute to society, for example: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_S._Burroughs
Feel free to respond with your reasonings, though think in the end they'll fail to be reasonable.
Best way to learn about money laundering (ML) is to study anti-money laundering (AML), since most laundering outfits aren't going to write a book about how they do what they do.
Most interesting thing about ML is that in cooking the books, they've got to keep very good records of what's been done, otherwise they've got no idea what's going on; which is counter intuitive, since you would think they would not keep records.
As for what to do, volumes of books are published on the topic. If the content was hosted in the US, the next step would be contact the ISP that's hosting the content.