660 karma · joined April 10, 2009
In my experience in Europe, an employment contract will state number of hours (say 36, 40, etc) and you need to be present and available for that time. These are non-hourly contracts (e.g. salary is expressed by month not hour). None of that has anything to do with productivity, to your/mine point.
Look, i’m not saying it is a valuable way of looking at productivity at all, but the fraud aspect is reasonably clear.
So if it states 40 hours, you put in 40 hours. If you do nothing during those 40 hours, we can have a moral/ethics discussion about if and how you should change the situation etc, but at that point we’re outside of the fraud scenario in my opinion.
($x for y hours, but y hours were not delivered, only a fraction was.)
Just so I’m clear; I don’t think that works at all in a knowledge worker environment, but tell that to the judge?
There are also positive aspects that hang in the balance. Personally (as a people manager) I appreciated the positive impact (coaching, career development) I could make to people around me in ways that are not easily replicated in other roles. And there are many others.
It’s just not private planes and Champaign.
Be intentional about who you spend time with, who you work with, who you serve, and who you listen to. (March 2019, Patrick McKenzie, @patio11)
Dreams don't work unless you do (April 2019, Sara Dietschy)
The failure mode of clever is 'asshole' (John Scalzi, 2010)
Just because you love the mountains doesn't mean they love you. (Lou Whittaker, Rainier mountain guide)
Show me your calendar and I will tell you your priorities. Tell me who your friends are, and I’ll tell you where you’re going. (April 2021, https://kk.org/thetechnium/99-additional-bits-of-unsolicited...)
Feedback is nutrition. Everyone goes for the sugar and positive feedback, but you need your greens too. (Oct 2014, Morten Heuing)
You're arguing they lower their prices, and thats just going to cement their position.
[0] https://strobist.blogspot.com/ [1] https://strobist.blogspot.com/2006/03/lighting-101.html
This position assumes the ills from over a century ago have been fully resolved _right now_. Watching the news, that does not seem to be case.
(I try not to put these words in your mouth, you're stating "And strongly support fixing our ongoing treatment of them."!)
For a while I was thinking of setting myself the rule of only using my own images to circumvent this.