origini

Yeah i mentioned it for transparency not because i believe it

I know him and saw his talks.

My argument though was, that some people think we should go to mars and do stuff on mars or moon. Rocks without a chance of keeping themselves alive their without earth and whats their main reason? Because we need a backup for earth.

And for sure they are not responsible for the whole of us getting a little bit better.

Its just that someone has to actually finance this long enough. If you start to early and can't keep up the sstory telling, lights go out

Social systems? I know i might talk to an US American, but most countries on the planet have one, besides US America.

But even US American get foodstamps right? Not all of them have to live in their cars?

How much control do you have with companies which are managing some 401k (USA) or similiar things in other countries?

If they blindly invest in random companies even with P/Es in 3 digits, thats overvaluated.

The move happens because your retirement is getting less in a crash, but that money was moved around because you bought shares and someone else sold them.

What will be the margin? if its a healthy one, its not gambling its investment. If its good, it becomes gambling.

At least 2fa got removed. Man i hate this, every single shit wants 2fa.

Let me do 2fa when i have to pay not to just login to services i care very little.

And yes blizzard my wow account is not worth anything either.

If we are lucky, all of this will not matter if we reach post scarcity.

Would be even really really good if we would start breaking through barriers regarding state spending and allowing more to do so in a way that inflation is not affected.

Like allowing every state on the planet to 'spend' money on certain things like renewable or teachers or care workers.

Lucky enough we don't live in a free market. US America perhaps more than germany, non the less there are plenty of regulations to protect consumers.

If a recession was started because someone else is taking your retirement fonds and putting them in companies overvaluated to move money from retirement fonds to random other people, and this is closer to gambling than investment, regulators should step in.

In theory we could just come together, start focusing on building a working society which defines what we need and what we want and just build it efficently.

We could just get rid of any inefficency.

Capitalism is driving our current economy, it doesn't has to.

There is no real reason why we couldn't decide tomorrow that every car is electric and depending on some factor you can just request a car.

Planet earth has resources x, the only question is for what we use it and how we distribute it.

But no if i want to be self sufficient (100%) i can't do this.

If i want to exit capitalism and build up a country not defined by it, i can't either.

If i kill bad leaders, i will be thrown in prison.

Thats not true anymore and is the issue why its unclear.

I work and do something very specific, a lot of people around me do not need what I do.

I need water, food, energy, I don't know anyone personally who is providing this for me.

Then we have A LOT of people in our society (no critisism here) who get food, housing energy etc. without satisfying anyone.

What i want to say: 1. in a highly automated society there is a real disconnect between you getting something and you doing something for it.

A typical tech job in germany needs 35-40h.

So they offered third level registration for all non taken domains?

Yeah really unique, lovely and well made

Thats not the point i made.

Its just different if you can look at your phone or turn it on or not.

Nope not ringing any bell.

I have bought my *.name domain a decade ago? Why was this ever a thing? Was there some limitation i'm to stupid to get or did one company just register some common last names?

I do not remember anyone saying Starlink would fail.

I really really despite Elon Musk for plenty of things but i don't think Space-X is not successful, i just think its not worth its share price.

But i'm for sure not liking that one person can just decide to put stuff into our space and disrupt research and my view without paying for it somehow.

And the biggest issue ish Elon Musks behaviour: he is for sure no one who would take something like atmospheric poisening serious until its too late or someone forced him to do so.

I would argue that it is still a different feeling if you actually away from society and out there vs. just around the corner in the big garden.

What and how they argued

The whole content of it.

I mean something which motivates us as humans to actually wanting to go into space.

Do i want to go to space in general? yes. Do i want to go into space if there is nothing? No.

I mean breakthroughs in like technology which brings us to mars in an hour and to other galaxies. A signal of motivation to explore space itself.

Oh i see.

Never heard of Strands before, felt complelty different when reading it more like a sales pitch from a consulting company

So why did they not even try Haiku 5.5?

Why would Amazon go to another company to let them provide an adjusted decider model?

Amazon already has all these tickets labeld, they could just have build it themselves?

CPUs control frequency themselves and throttle. No need for manual throttling.

And it also might be a problem with the cpu paste and not with air.

Look at space startups which will do their launches in 2027.

Space-X for its capability became a state issue, so China will just solve it on their end.

And then you have a payload issue: We don't need that much payload in space. We send up 3000 tons, 2000 is starlink.

Space-x is profitable with this for sure, no question ask, but its valued as a 2t company and with Starlink and payload only its valued 10x higher than its worth.

The profit they make today, they will have to share in 5-15 years.

if it goes the same way as Tesla, there is quite a moat to solve. I don't own shares so i could care little besides my worry on poisening our atmosphere and having real impact on our weather.

Feasable for sure, humans can solve this. But Elon Musk doesn't seem to really throw himself on solving power.

I find that very weird.

He 'makes' (panasonic) batteries on mass and had Tesla Solar roofs. So why instead of talking about a dyson sphere or DC in space, he wouldn't just build a solar city in the dessert, put some fiber around and start putting solar panels and his batteries around? AI is not that latency dependend than a lot of other things

The payload increased from 1000t to 3000t only because of starlink. What we will get is a lot more starlink like satelites which might also then need to be replaced every 5 years and poisening our atmosphwere while doing so.

Is there any more information or research done regarding the poisening of our atmosphere with A LOT more starlink satelites?

As far as i know, it can harm our ozon layer and change of temperature

They are evaluated as a 2T company and their Owner talks about Dysonspheres.

There are some constraints or expectations though.

I would argue that we need a breakthrough in space technology before we can do proper and reasonable spaceflight.

We were able to land on the moon 60 years ago (why is Artemis IV not planned for 2029?) and nothing happend after.

Why would we have enough resources to start building stuff on moon OR even on Mars if we don't have enough resources (apparently) to make earth better?

So who will pay for any of it? And how much margin will be left after the other companies caught up to Space-X?

If they would have enough v3, they would be able to build them fast enough and it would still be better to have them in orbit than keeping them on the floor and not knowing what to do with them.