pawelmurias

Agents write code in popular languages better.

Bitcoin was just purely wasting power for a token only used for crime and speculation.

The question is do the allow them to use their laptops to access llms. Like I assume before ai they where not allowing the kids to fry their brains doom scrolling but would allow programming. They weren't blocking all tech as they aren't raising subsistence farmers.

Tardux Linux

It would be impossible to come up with a name that reflected the nature of the gimp program better.

I would assume most people use native subtitles when it's hard to understand what words the actors said.

You could talk to a stone for even cheaper with way better effects.

Better for running web apps.

In the us there is often a disagreement if something was self defense or murder.

Pimps dying is great. The government should arresting, convicting and executing way more of them.

The idea is to make a group decision to stop all the kids from using social media rather then get your kid alienated by just blocking him. Some people on hackernews want their kids to have zero friends and play SNES games but that's not what we should aim for.

Blocking third-party cookies is a big privacy win. Getting untargeted ads is not something 99.9% of people care about and getting rid of actual real spying opportunities is great.

The AI tap complition is >100000% better than the coding assistants, it just saves you typing and doesn't introduce new bugs you need to fix instead of writting buggy shitty code from a text description.

Not in Poland. Before the last election we had 100% partisan media with the public media campaigning for the ruling party and the opposition controling the private media. Both had the Fox News/CNN/Pravda levels of objectivity showing a strange propaganda version of reality.

The alternative to buying ads is buying newspapers and other media outlets.

How are ads for less relevant products better? If the user tracking data is used only for showing ads and doesn't leak I would guess 99% of people would care about getting tracked.

I would prefer to see ads for things that I want rather then see ads for stuff I couldn't care less about. If I get convinced to buy useful things it's a win/win.

The vision in "Brave New World" seems so unrealistic and far fetched that for me to treat it as any sort of warning or deep insight.

Those scholar use a particularly racist definition.

Been only to one but it had decent food that you could eat ever day.

The desktop OS are all pretty bad so I wouldn't want to use that as an inspiration for anything.

Does it have a horrible brand reputation? The tech savy people complaining about the account review procedures are not the mainstream consumer.

A lot of psychology is vaguely science flavoured. You have them making a bunch of surveys and the making super broad claims based on this.

It's normal and expected that people won't care much what happens in 50 or 500 years. You will possibly be dead and it's too far away to reliably predict the consequence of event in that time span.

If you could make such a rice it would be awesome.

If we accept subpar nutrition we could propably plant GMO potatoes and things like that all over the place

This would be utterly horrible. AGI/automation is a valuable thing while being forced to toil working the land sucks hard.

Gimp is horrible. It's existance propably has a negative value on society by discouraging kids from pursuing art when they try it.

When I added a " to the end of the prompt by accident I got a wrong answer.

LLMs are idiots. They can't reason properly and only parrot stuff

https://chatgpt.com/share/dcb4ff4e-e8a2-463b-86ec-9caf10b6e6...

Sometimes they get the answer right to something really complex because it fits a pattern, but sometimes they answer with something really really stupid.