I would say everyone is leaning towards organization/individual right now but I would image that flips as the number of agents grow
250 karma · joined February 4, 2020
I would say everyone is leaning towards organization/individual right now but I would image that flips as the number of agents grow
We’re partnering with them on Web Bot Auth
You should check out our most recent announcement about Web Bot Auth
https://www.browserbase.com/blog/cloudflare-browserbase-pion...
https://www.browserbase.com/blog/cloudflare-browserbase-pion...
You should check out our most recent announcement about Web Bot Auth
https://www.browserbase.com/blog/cloudflare-browserbase-pion...
Do you think callbacks are how this gets done?
B2B deals at 200-300k+ are your best bet at selling this IMO.
The vast majority of new deposits are leveraging different technology to enrich yields or extract it from challenging environments. Seems like a common problem for resource extraction that gets solved with time and investment.
Seems like a few hundred micro satellites could circumvent sovereignty this way.
However, you mentioned that today is an admission that the bot problem is worse. However that not true, the restrictions are specifically on viewing data (scrapers) rather than creating data (bots).
"Using cars to drive down roads we already know how to traverse with horses and just add more complexity is bound to not go anywhere useful in my opinion."
Also doesn't hurt to reach out to potential managers as they'll be able to provide more direct feedback.
Add to the fact that OpenAI is almost certainly going to be expanding wildly given that they have taken on a 10B investment, it seems like as good as a time as any.
Kind of like map reducing the articles.
At the same time, a lack of growth limits how much can be invested on staying relevant in terms of R&D which further separates them from competitors with a positive growth trajectory.
Its also incredibly hard to kickstart a growth engine once it has slowed down. The net result is a flywheel but in the opposite direction.
PE buys companies like this to slow that negative growth flywheel down attempting to stay neutral until the investment is paid off at which point profit can be made.
The long tail is massive attrition as well, because few people want to work at a sinking ship or rather a ship unwilling to invest internally.
Neutral isn't bad, but it's very hard to exist.
When applied blindly you end up with scenario you described. Product direction that says something isn't necessary because the question was never asked to begin with.
Science without the hypothesis.
Strange, I know plenty of people that do see an upside, including myself. It's a choice to believe things can and will get better.
Unless you have a crystal ball, we're both choosing to believe in an unknown future. So choosing to believe it will get worse is no different from believing it will get better. Although one is arguably better for mental health.
That coupled with the quizzing capability could be huge for students in medical school for example.
So each segment is a separate partition.