71 karma · joined July 25, 2013
Gloomwood (first person stealth) and Fallen Aces are a couple of gems still in early access.
This covers more of the shenanigans: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOCTSp_U-KI
Apologies for a video link but that's all I have.
"I'm sure they thought of this, but could someone explain why they don't just divert...?"
Even that was debatable given the restrictions placed on the version of Stockfish it played.
Not to take anything away from AlphaZero either, self play to reach that level was quite the achievement.
Not making a judgement either way, just adding more data.
The site desperately needs some form of meta moderation.. I've barely scrolled this thread and seen multiple examples already.
MrBeast was just on Flagrant with Andrew Schulz for 4 hours, a day or so ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGrk7Mzm4uo
This was also an interesting and fun interview which I expected to skip over fairly quickly but ended up listening to in the entirety. Some discussion over how you would lose something like 3% of viewers if somebody sneezed, went to the toilet, and so on.. Other things to avoid, like any signalling that the video is winding down will lose you a huge chunk of viewers instantly.
However take this with a pinch of salt too, I wouldn't like to bet on being fully correct! ;)
Personally I don't know enough to know if that's the case?
"They must have the data" is a very popular way to appeal to authority lately.
I expected the answer is site and consent management system dependent, so where I really couldn't avoid one of these sites, I'd manually object to all legitimate interest first before pressing it. Such a PITA and probably pointless ultimately, but hey..
I've been using it for many years by now, and have essentially given up on it recently.
I'd often set for past year/month and get articles, reviews, etc that were clearly dated many years previous. I don't know if the site are responsible for the gaming of search, or Google themselves, but the result is the same. I have some doubt that PC hardware review sites are gaming dates on their old articles, although I accept it could be in their interest to do so too.
It's honestly absurd the amount of different dark patterns they're using to try to trick users.
This is an utterly absurd apology on behalf of Apple, something very common in this thread it seems.
Alternatively, perhaps Apple should sell their high-end model with an appropriately powerful AC adapter, regardless of the absence of the battery?
"User replaceable" barely does it justice either. I just had the battery in my hands in under 5 seconds easily. People earlier in the thread stating iPhone batteries are easily user replaceable are ridiculous, when the process can take upward of 20 minutes, and can leave the phone temporarily inoperable if any of the multiple connectors aren't quite seated correctly. I'm also intrigued as to where all this imaginary extra weight and bulk is coming from when implementing specifically the S5 battery enclosure design, because having stripped down hundreds of iPhones and dozens of Galaxy variants I just don't see it.
This is a dangerously naive attitude.
Please, continue to assume Putin is a stereotypical cartoon villain. One would think users of a site like HN would have at least passing knowledge of Occam's Razor...