Free trade is an advantage to these who have the capital to move around, and to the idea of consumerism because unnecessary goods can be cheaper.
267 karma · joined January 20, 2016
Free trade is an advantage to these who have the capital to move around, and to the idea of consumerism because unnecessary goods can be cheaper.
In a lot of instances 'free-trade' agreements exist to help the mega-rich, this seems like a perfect example.
Pretty much everyone is to blame, but the people with more power deserve much more blame.
It is sort of a doubled edged sword, if race and gender have no significant effect on outcome, then in a way that could be used as a justification for blocking those people from said positions. On the other hand, if it's the opposite then is purely superficial.
Sure people are using Facebook to get some value, but the value they are getting is nothing compared to the land owners value.
Also, the users of Facebook are the 'product' not the customer(advertisers are the customer).
Isn't your second point supporting the claims of the article?