3,274 karma · joined July 1, 2013
LE: Ok, so it's a little more different that JetBrains Mono as this comparison shows https://claude.ai/artifact/HPiALZ7AZ2f5FxSZtcTdNa
This, I think, is great product design. More than babysitting the code, it's about hammering the experience until it's as useful, ergonomic and delightful as possible for the user.
It was indeed human assisted.
"Oh, yeah, I know a cool trick, but y'all have to wait until tomorrow to find out what it is."
"Look! It's a way to evaluate SQL expressions with a select with a from! Oh, you already knew about it?"
I have nothing against sharing knowledge, especially when seeing someone else do something that can be done better. But just leaving daily breadcrumbs to remind people you're the guy that teaches random trivia feels like attention seeking.
Edit: changed the LLMs pronoun to it.
Or something, I don't remember...
The problem with LLM explanations of unknown topics is that you literally cannot determine how right or wrong it is. I usually ask LLMs to bring references and they almost always admit they pulled random shit out of their ass and quickly appologize when evidence to the contrary surfaces.
There's not much stopping US from becoming an authoritarian regime, and the US is already using AI against its own citizens.
Competition is always good.
I never got to design a good representation of the entire ecosystem to simulate (external pressure, debt, military and technological advancements, international soft power, etc.).
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Codex <codex@openai.com>
Co-authored-by: Composer <composer@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor Grok 4.5 <noreply@cursor.com>
How do you get so many agents to co-author a single commit?