Be a human: mistakes and problems happen, that's a fact of life. What matters is how you act upon them.
1,102 karma · joined March 27, 2012
More on https://rocketeer.be/ / https://garage61.net
Be a human: mistakes and problems happen, that's a fact of life. What matters is how you act upon them.
But it's obviously much easier to criticize if you don't actually dive deeper than the name of things.
Does this mean Go is perfect? Not at all.
It just means I'd rather have generics late than fundamentally broken.
Will get this one fixed ASAP.
If anyone is interested, we're building a new (and hopefully) better platform to handle telemetry/race data over on https://garage61.net/
It's still super alpha so not much to see yet, but moving fast (the HN-way :-)).
Love to have a chat with any fellow iRacing HN users, we're on Discord: https://discord.gg/94XwwyCkCW
AMA related to iRacing / telemetry
Not that it justifies any pain, just found it to be a pleasant side-effect.
Sometimes it's worthwhile to just give in and try something new, even if you don't like it. You might discover unexpected advantages. Then go back to what you prefer and apply those lessons there.
Everything would be much better if we all kept an open mind and learned from each-others experiences. It might not always be obvious, but things are usually a certain way for a good reason. Might not be the best or right reason in the long run, but there's always some lesson to be learned.
Much queries per second is fine, but I care about latency. Unless you're in AWS, it'll be hard to beat AWS RDS on that count.
That doesn't even apply for an IDE. As a vim user I always feel lost in those at first.
Any tool with a bit of power will require familiarization. You won't get the most out of that IDE unless you learn it.
My biggest complaint still stands: no true API (which is what made flickr great).
Love Google Photos, add a real API and it'll be even better.
* This breaks inter-op with other projects under a different open-source license. So for anything that's a library or a package: don't use this.
* What happens when other people contribute? Do they also get a part of the income (how?), or is this an implicit copyright grant (like a CLA)?
I guess this needs work, but it's good to see efforts to make open-source a sustainable business (not sure if a license is the right way to do it though).
More info here: http://blog.golang.org/playground
I happily pay for things, but when I do I like to verify that it does what it says on the box.
But that's not what most logging systems that log to binary files offer. They give you specs (example: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/journal-fil...) and tools.
Binary doesn't have to mean closed/opaque.
Nope, that's the old one for V2 (which isn't very good).
We're currently releasing the third generation of the Ticketmatic platform, where one of the big efforts is in improving the developer story.
That's not public yet, for which I apologise. There will be a beautiful developer program soon.
I didn't think that the article should wait on that. It's the idea that matters and didn't want any discussion to turn into a nitpicking over what we did right (and wrong).
This article mostly came out of a frustration with bad API documentation and I was hoping to inspire people to do (slightly) better.
In the end it all generalizes to "Your product is only as good as its experience".
Still: anyone know of this with historical graphs?
While I mainly use it as a library, it is also capable of standing on its own as a CLI tool, so you could use this in pretty much any context (read: not Go).