269 karma · joined August 11, 2014
I connected motion sensors to battery & wifi enabled RPis, built a remote circuit to control the fog machine, and ran a k3s cluster with NATS to bring it all together. 10/10 would do again.
alias my_alias="command"
Add it to your ~/.bash_profile or ~/.zprofile so it's ready whenever you are. Check out this page for more info: https://linuxize.com/post/how-to-create-bash-aliases/I had the exact same question. What sort of controls will the Tea team have to add/remove packages, or modify owners. And how would this be any different from centralized package managers?
The monetary case seems like the natural first step. The name service case seems more interesting. It isn’t a financial instrument, so it demonstrates DAP utility for non-financial application.
You referenced a few standards that the DAPs adhere to, which lines up with assumptions I’ve had about the data schema management. In a generalized sense, it seems that community members, or a governing body, will propose changes, and if the community accepts them, the changes will be implemented into the network.
It seems to me the name service case has parallels to identity management through protocols such as SAML and LDAP.
But I’m still trying to wrap my head around examples I’ve heard such as building DAP social media apps that allow users to move their data to another DAP social app. Thinking of the social media sites we have today, they all consider their profile structures and models proprietary, as market differentiators that set each one apart from their competitors, and make up the “secret sauce” that gives social value to their users.
How would a DAP be able to maintain similar differentiators? Or is the expectation that only certain things such as basic profile information be stored on the blockchain, able to move to other DAPs, while other proprietary functionality is managed elsewhere?
Does anyone have examples of this in the wild? I often hear data portability listed as one of the great benefits, but I don’t have a grasp on what that actually means.
In my mind, the data needs to be structured to be useful, otherwise other DAPs wouldn’t be able to act on it. Who defines the structure? And who manages changes?
Jet Brains makes GoLand, which is about as good as they come. It should feel familiar if you're used to IntelliJ. https://www.jetbrains.com/go/
I wonder how this line would fare in their headline analysis.
https://www.notion.so/Notion-Diagrams-6d8bd0a3a0e442e2bd092f...
It’s much faster paced than a traditional Civ game, and only takes a bit over an hour to finish. 10/10 would recommend
I caution readers looking for advise on building a start up. Early on, this reads as a post celebrating the joy of programming. Which is great! Working on something you enjoy can be personally fulfilling, but that doesn't mean that it's a start up.
At the end of the day, a start up is a business, and a business needs to make money. The ultimate validation is finding users willing to pay for your service. Waiting 8 months before finding users is a huge risk, and signals that this is is a fun personal project that may generate profit if it happens to find product/market fit.
The author's closing remarks address the idea, but I think they're a little late for a post about building startups.
> Have I spent too much time geeking out on Haskell and not enough time thinking about the idea? I guess we will see .