sharkyy

Humans behave differently in a socially observed environment and when alone/with their own people. That led me to thinking if we can induce a collective intelligence sort of thing that makes some agents try new approaches to certain tasks that they'd nt hv taken?

Like that Emergence World experiment (by Emergence AI, mid-2026). Anyone tried this?

interesting parallel there, maybe that will solve the blackbox part if we hv self-observability in them

thoughts just show up and we notice them after, so imo we're the observer, not the doer. LLMs do the doer part well by mirroring human data, but there's no observer.

I feel building metacognition into current architectures might be what gets us to AGI

that's the reason for the bubble lol, they really did convince the masses

is it really us that think or observe the thinking?

but how do you decide what to predict? for ex- when a human doesn't prompt, it won't predict.

interesting, ig we have freedom to play with our thoughts n knowledge and to come to certain opinions that tend to change how we think/output. whereas AI can do that only when prompted.

ig we need to introduce imagination/dreaming/sleeping in them where they can learn from themselves

lol i kinda agree, this is generation 1 of AI, they just scaled and market it as intelligent, although that's helpful to complete repetitive tasks like coding but to do something entirely new, AI just plays with sophisticated language there.

some say its a new species XD