68 karma · joined July 15, 2013
[0] Don't fool yourself into thinking that only people without the income or capital to live well in the Bay Area would leave it. There are intangibles (culture, traffic, distance to skiing, etc.) that, for some people, are non-optimal. For others, it's perfect. That's okay, humans are a varied lot (and it's a good thing).
[1] Nothing major, it will remain expensive due to geography and talent/creativity/capital density.
I agree that stewardship of the environment is very important.
I got into the habit of periodically giving it a good squeeze while resting my hand on it.
https://www.armed-services.senate.gov
You can do a "wikipedia dive" on that site and take away a depth of understanding that, honestly, probably exceeds 99% of political commentators'.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Map_projection#Projections_b...
Why? Are we Puritans now?
I've been on the receiving end of false (non-harassment) accusations and it sucks. I now take precautions to prevent that from happening again and I don't think it's unreasonable to expect that BPD or sociopath women would use false harassment accusations to achieve their means.
Unfortunately, that might just reflect the poor quality overall – or the general homogeneity of the population – than some type of progressive success.
Maybe that's still considered a "good thing"; c.f. the infamous Thatcher video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okHGCz6xxiw
"You'd rather the poor be poorer provided the rich were less rich!"