Seriously, proving loss due to something like this should be not too difficult. There is money to be made here - with the ancillary end result being Apple loses, what little position it has, in the point-of-care market.
1,343 karma · joined August 24, 2010
Seriously, proving loss due to something like this should be not too difficult. There is money to be made here - with the ancillary end result being Apple loses, what little position it has, in the point-of-care market.
http://come-from-beyond.com/about-me/
Or, it is all a part of an elaborate MIT prank!
Do we have any solid, statistical evidence in support of these claims?
The modern “factory farming” is not something I care to defend for any intent or purpose. It may as well disappear tomorrow, as far as I am concerned.
However, I still see no argument against deeply caring domestication of a small number/herd of animals, providing them food, shelter and care in exchange for milk or unfertilized eggs. Can’t seem to find a convincing argument against that in my current ethics framework.
(1). Is there any scientifically sound study proving that the quality of protein from plant sources is equivalent to or better than from dairy products?
(2). Is there any reproducible, quantitative data on leaving milk producing cows to fend for themselves vs caring for them in small -to- mid size "cow caring" setups (farms, one-cow ops etc.)? I ask this because both my maternal and paternal grandparents had 1 to 3 milk producing cows at any given point in time - from what I recall, they were well cared for (food, medicine, weather etc.)
(3). If we, as a species, were to stop consuming dairy products today, or cut consumption by, say 90% over the next year, what would become of the current cow population? How is that better than the current situation for the animals?
I am personally, utterly and deeply biased towards the survive-and-let-survive school of life --- so take what I say colored by my very, very, un-apologetically biased PoV.
If you don’t like the Chinese playbook, don’t play in China. Your company does not have a right to the Chinese market on your terms - only on their terms. If you disagree, I’ve got a generic HCV drug market you (and Gilead) are going to love.
You are not the customer, just a seller. You don’t matter. The “Amazon smile” is for customers only.
alias gits='git status'They already do, it browses only Netflix, and they call it an app - at least on all non-general purpose computational devices e.g. smartphones, smart tvs etc.
https://www.amazon.com/Anger-Cooling-Thich-Nhat-Hanh/dp/1573...
Also, check your blood pressure regularly every morning and evening, for a few weeks. You could be non-symptomatically hypertensive (for all sorts of reasons); talk to your doctor if you find your blood pressure consistently on the higher side.
I am too skeptical to trust this assumption. And the current state of democracy in the U.S. does not make me feel too optimistic about the longer term either.
Except in the industries and product areas where IP is being used for land-grabs, rent-collection, little-to-none innovation and roadblocking any and all competition. In those cases (as E-Ink), I am glad there are still places in this world where people can continue to push the envelope and innovate to create better products for our species. IP be damned.
Source: I'm from a part of India where that first name/last name are very common.
- Electric percolator with pre-ground Starbucks light-roast coffee (used to be Intelligentsia Honey Badger, before they souled-out to shitty Peet's).
- IKEA steel french press
- Nespresso (Original - not the supersize American version)
- Hario coffee hand mill for coffee beans (much rarely than before for time-availablity issues)
But, my go-to coffee on many days is the Folgers/Nescafé instant coffee.
If your instant coffee is really better (and I mean really) than what's on the market, and you can maintain consistent quality over time, I am in your target demographic.
Sign me up with a sampler!
Why shouldn't the lender also assume part of this risk?
Why is their recoupment guaranteed (student loans can't be dissolved in bankruptcy)?
Why are they always likely to be bailed out (prove me wrong by showing a student loan lender that went into bankruptcy)?
Lenders need to do more due diligence and stop lending to students that are more likely to have problems with payback. The entire liability should not be assumed by the borrowers and co-signers.