singpolyma3

Yes this is true of some of course. But if it were true of all nothing would happen

Break even is staying is business :)

And you do it to provide the product/service, provide for your workers, etc

And yet even while you indolently phone it in, if you're any good they make a lot more off you than they pay you.

By law or by collective bargaining

Given that that's all anyone talks about for at least several decades I don't think it's "nobody"

I imagine there was also the ethical concern of putting all those people out of work...

Had two seats literally one election ago and are looking likely to get that second one back.

I know two seats is not "a force" but saying they'll never have another than one seems silly in this context.

We don't need new versions of http or SMTP because they're already simple and great and they're dumb protocols so there's not much you could ever add

If you want something else you can take your pick based on need from dozens of other options

Except for my entire 20s the conservatives were in power, so...

So long as the primary purpose of school is to babysit children while their parents "work" it can never be supplanted by anything educational.

The author already did and they were pretty good at it.

HTML but allowing XML compatible syntax to be valid.

XHTML5 sort of gets us there, but parsing in standard HTML5 mode still won't do the right thing with eg <b />

That's what browsers at the time did. But the format could be used with a lenient parser if anyone wanted that

They're going to do all those things with or without AI. We need to fight the end goals at a social level rather than the temporary means

They wouldn't need to "do that" that's how it already works. They're actively undoing that

I not think people count robots are AI. Unless they're intelligent robots.

I think this has already happened.

Yes sure, some kind of middle class job is worth it. But most of the article it about how to get minor gains inside that middle class job

If you're at 5 million you're already well past wealthy and should probably not be stressing about this.

It takes over two thirds of the article to get to the actually relevant advice: spend less, invest the difference.

Kissing ass at work might help you but not nearly as much as this two ideas.

If you own a house you are the wealthy. If you own a house on which it is possible to owe significant property tax you are the very wealthy.

Used to be broader. Some people wish to narrow it

I think the opposite. 20 years ago self hosting almost always meant "in a data centre" but as home internet got better people started to think "or maybe in my basement" and now it's swung so far that a few think if it's not in your basement it's not self hosting

Why should there be a cap? If you're so rich as to own some property, why do you need protection from paying a reasonable rate of tax?

I not think anyone means "talk to representative" when they say "lobbying" unless it is accompanied by contributions

The beginning? I think we're at least towards the middle by now...

No, that's not called lobbying. It's lobbying when it involves paying for access. If you're just making calls and writing letters it's just advocacy not lobbying

Great example, since in practise goto is essential

What about all the intellectual communities springing up around AI use?

It is open source