singularity2001

I have the sensational $200 bamboo lab printer what would the $700 thing give me more?

rarely * 2 ≈ still rarely?

We ate them (and married)

So instead of the narrative of benchmaxing, in truth it's benchminimizing of competitors by the U.S. oligarchy?

there are rumors on Twitter that these upload system profiles to a S3 bucket.

I don't think AI can fix the process, ideology or people issues.

It can if a single developer replaces a whole team.

that would be one white page for me.

how do they distinguish 'attackers' from usual crawlers?

" There has been a lot of partiality in tech recently to plainly fascist "

For a second, I thought this is Dangs / HN official view now lol

with a different title, they would have achieved much higher engagement. e.g. CERN and Mistral evaluate if large latent models can advance physics

change a byte ... change it back, get a duplicate.

What are realistic scenarios in which you change a byte back?

switching to copy on write worktrees is the biggest game changer it should become common knowledge pretty soon and it's already available on most operating systems

in theory it could avoid car crashes in practice the dudes that buy these cars will probably cause more crashes;)

> now that AI has solved all our problems

Make it your problem to find problems that AI have not yet solved. Problem solved.

maybe they visited huggingface or something similar

as the article says one of the main jobs of the humans is to say no to Claude regularly

"There are no alarms ringing." I kid you not, that's the latest tick when I want to stop alarms with three devices in the room.

the most provocative comparison which I've heard a couple of times was "elevator operators".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galactic_algorithm for those not in the know.

It says much more than that. It says that all custom architectures and approaches are become irrelevant if compute increases, which was proven again by the large latent models recently solving RL tasks better than any classical RL technique.

Checking that the theorem is what we really want to prove is much much less work than going through the whole proof though.

the common distinction between robot and machine is that machines are mostly stationary and don't move by themselves. (Self-driving cars sit in between, depending on further developments, they might slide into the bot category.)

they definitely do get answers. maybe the path is incomprehensible to you, but the yes or no answer is definitely there: that's what the formal provers are there for. In the worst case you have an Oracle which just answers your question with yes or no but in truth you get many more details if you want to look

just because humans don't understand it yet doesn't mean that the machine doesn't understand it and can build upon it

it's data for humans its knowledge for AI. they might be able to process it understand it and build upon it even further

congenially my agents started calling bugs gaps

what he doesn't measure well are people completely starting to reject his videos for the same reason reasons (not explicitly motivated just because something feels really off about the whole show, for example in his strong versus smart videos the smart stood no chance because they had to do muscle competitions too)

Glad that this pops up again because someone flagged a similar discussion:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50029630

It's a big missed opportunity in history that they did not put charges against the war criminals of the Iraq War. They would probably never succeed with these charges, but at least they would have made a statement similar to how Italy declared some Americans as war criminals.

We will get incredible abundance and health before the singularity. After that, all bets are off (almost by definition)