smallnix

> Was it in danger of being knocked down?

Abolishing the listings mechanism in favor of an ad-hoc protection mechanism (when destruction is imminent) seems worse.

> It’s kind of crazy that they have been slow to create real products and competitive large scale models from their research.

I always thought they deliberately tried to contain the genie in the bottle as long as they could

> Computer science has been advancing language design by building higher and higher level languages

Why? Because new languages have an IR in their compilation path?

This touches the toupet fallacy: "I never saw a large company fail to grow large because of deferred scaling"

Friendster might fit though: https://highscalability.com/friendster-lost-lead-because-of-...

Even that would be wrong. Von der Leyen was strong armed into her position by Merkel and the other heads of states, overruling Timmermans nomination.

Isn't every AI datacenter chip manufacturer critically dependent on EU (ASML)?

If the car that did a hit-and-run was operated autonomously the insurance of the maker of that car should pay. Otherwise it's a human and the situation falls into the bucket of what we already have today.

So yes, carmakers would pay in a hit-and-run.

E.g. with stuxnet they got to the air-gapped machines by letting worms loose on the network of suppliers, targeting technicians laptops.

> no technology could recognize that.

Perhaps require monitoring of the arm muscle electrical signals, build a profile, match the readings to the game actions and check that the profile matches the advertised player

Sounds like it could be fixed by making it configurable to hide all issues without a certain tag (or auto-apply a hiding tag) for the issues "landing page".

Interesting that EU is becoming stricter than US with growing life expectancy.

Life + 70 can mean the work is protected 120 years (publish at 40, dies at 90)?

I know experts who deciphered this. But I will not tell you their names.

Agree, I finally found information via

Homepage -> blog -> docs -> "all docs" button:

https://exe.dev/docs/list

Which has an about and pricing etc.

That is very counterintuitive to just find out what this is.

Before picking this I would benchmark on my existing data using e.g. https://unit8co.github.io/darts/index.html#regression-models

> Herman

Who or what is that?

In oauth2: when I /1 associate a random uuidv4 for each new flow with my user (server side), /2 stick that uuid into the state parameter, and then /3 look up my user with this on callback-endpoint execution. Isn't PKCE in that case redundant?

Well, I wouldn't love Batman in my apartment either.

Unlike the article, your comment, does not provide evidence beyond "sniff test". The article brings up paintings of statues, which is an interesting data point.

And an article "experts are trolling public" creates more attention than "experts stick to evidence and aren't artists"

> the risk

What is the risk really? I mean put in numbers.

> at the Department of Defense

*Department of War

TL;DR: inside trading /s

> Acronyms are abbreviations for meaningful names.

I think often words are added to allow for a memorable name, such as crispr

> When Mojica and Jansen struck up a correspondence, they began tossing around catchy names for the patterns, and on Nov. 21, 2001, they settled on CRISPR—an acronym for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats.

https://nautil.us/the-unbearable-weirdness-of-crispr-236685/

That's not the point of the article. It's about Claude/LLM being overconfident in recreating pixel perfect.

What is the difference between "storing carbon" vs. "trapping carbon"?

Do you mean cause Thiel says he based the core of his beliefs on Schmitts teachings, a fervent nazi? Don't get the connection otherwise.

I recommend to read the source:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/10/peter-thiel-...

The flow diagram for yes/no attend meeting is missing to weigh the estimated impact you can make against other meetings.

Even if I can contribute real value to 20 meetings which I am invited to, I can't attend all of them.

> Who's to say there isn't something out there we haven't discovered yet

Occam's razor? We should work with as few assumptions as possible to get a model with the largest scope. Otherwise we get stuck with a hard to falsify mess.