https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGKVQNtkdzw
https://loudwire.com/rolling-stones-once-wrote-rice-krispies...
511 karma · joined November 28, 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGKVQNtkdzw
https://loudwire.com/rolling-stones-once-wrote-rice-krispies...
Amongst many other issues, The Post Office has a historic freedom to investigate, pursue and prosecute criminal cases on its own behalf- no need to persuade e.g. the police. This has been shown, for anyone with any doubt, to be a massive conflict of interest. Another repeated occurrence is the discovery that the Post Office claimed, but would not provide evidence and used this 'position' to bully people into accepting plea bargains. Essentially the Post Office dishonestly and deliberately abused its position in numerous cases to bypass the legal system in each of the home nations so that defendants would simply turn up in court to plead guilty and be sentenced. Had these cases been required to meet the standards of a conventional criminal investigation and trial in any of the UK home nations, many more of them would have failed to convict.
Sam Bankman-Freid was orginally arrested in the Bahamas in December 2022, extradited to the US and bailed before being remanded in custody in August 2023. His trial is due to start this week so he still accused but not convicted or sentenced.
What exactly is the different manner that you are referring to here?
(i.e. I use this. I did not create it)
iPlayer applies geofencing comparable to many other streaming services. Yes they pursue people in the UK regarding watching without a licence. No I've never heard of them extraditing people from other countries for breaking a UK specific law. Bear in mind that you can't get a TV licence for outside the UK. I struggle to see how that would work. My guess is that this is a Starbucks specific rule.
In this case it's pretty clearly uncharacteristic behaviour by any measure, including the geographical movement between transactions.
That depends on the contract. 2 weeks might be typical for a US contract but it can certainly vary.
> You could perhaps sue for other losses due to breach of contract but it wouldn't be wrongful dismissal and it would be a major departure from the British way of doing things.
I'm sorry I don't know where you get this idea of 'the British way of doing things' I've lived here my whole life and I've never heard this. Regardless, it doesn't constitute an argument. Consequential loss is absolutely a thing.
Brilliant! I'm stealing this!