549 karma · joined February 28, 2018
It's not quite as abusive as what could have happened when student loans were dischargeable in bankruptcy- it takes 20 years and you're taxed on the forgiveness- but I thought it was quite perverse that the institution charging towering sums of money is teaching the students in blanket fashion how to avoid paying it off.
Although, care must be taken, as many nominally warm LED's still have a huge amount of blue emissions. For example every Philips colored LED bulb, including red and orange, have a big spike of blue. The only exception is the yellow bulb, which is sold as a bug bulb... In other words, the engineers only chose to control the blue emissions in the one bulb; everything else is default full of blue.
Exposure to blue light suppresses melatonin levels. Melatonin is previously understood to regulate sleep. Ergo, while causation between blue light exposure and sleep quality is not proven, we at least have grounds for suspicion.
What understanding am I missing? What "facts" are being misused?
Now if by "years" you meant "two years", then fine, I can believe it- but two years is still a fantastic payoff period.
Don't forget HPS burns out pretty regularly too. Tactic my muni is using is simply to replace burnt-out HPS with LED instead of repairing it. Lo, after a few years we're probably half LED.
It's cheap now but the perception remains.
You know who really stands to benefit the most? The companies that get to sell us blue equipment, and then next sell us replacement blue-filtered equipment when we prove night time blue light is a problem.
The cities that have already installed 5000K or 6500K (aka "daylight") lamps will be the natural experiments.
Dell's privatizations comes to mind. It was taken private temporarily, not to hoard all the gains, but to allow a single stakeholder to call all the shots and attempt a turnaround. Now it's going public again.
Even more simply, just imagine how the market might look different if you could invest in a VC. You don't pick startups, you pick a VC- kind of like picking a fund today.
But does anyone really use the GUI? I was always under the impression nobody, including Xilinx, really cared about the GUI because most commercial projects probably did things headless, invoking the toolchain directly. In other words, it wasn't really meant to be a full time development environment like an IDE.
Half the time FPGA's come up, people ask "which FPGA can I get that has an integrated ARM core". So I suspect you may be on the money.
You certainly can get by with less, but that's not the point.
There definitely are some truly unrealistic standards out there, but the unhealthy or impossible are probably a small subset of the images we see these days.
I mean, sure, go ahead and charge the true cost. But I think artificially limiting mobility has a lot of downsides.
Congratulations, you've just created an unsolvable traffic light network, and magicked all-day gridlock out of thin air.
This is a multivariate optimization problem. We need to consider the repercussions of heavily over-provisioning parking.
Certainly by first principals of what we know, cell phone radiation should be harmless. But there's always the possibility we don't know something important yet, and given cellular radio's omnipresence, I figure it's worth humoring that possibility.
As for power output, I'm not a modem engineer but it sounds like GSM -> 3G -> 4G has progressively reduced power requirements by improving SNR & playing other tricks. Whereas with 5G, on the surface it sounds like the plan to increase bandwidth & performance is "take 4G and jack the frequency & power", so it's kind of the other direction and then makes sense why so many people are asking questions compared to the rollout of 3G or 4G.
There was a parallel trend of some really awesome apps clocking less than 4MB, which I attribute to good tooling. I wonder if Gmail, Facebook, et al have stripping & such turned off, or if they just have huge asset stores?