throwfaraway4

What a sad take. For the sake of human satisfaction I hope this is a minority perspective.

It's way way worse for kids especially adolescents

As is social media in general. I highly recommend reading the Anxious Generation

Unless it’s signed by the CEO it doesn’t matter

Company that rips-off creators to build their product complains other companies are doing the same to them.

The Market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.

Look who decided to finally show up and do their jobs.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1287_4gcj.pdf

Nah too expensive and too many cheap humans to use

Define "smart". "Your bring gets smart but your head gets dumb" - Smash Mouth

They call out moderation as being key

I mean so is sugar, alchohol, synthetic opioids, ect. Pick your poison. Life is about trade-offs.

Counterpoint. The weight and form factor are worth it alone for some usage patterns. Disclaimer: very happy Air user

Cool post but the cursor shadow is a huge distraction

> AI will replace every humans in performing every cognitive task

Maybe? I guess the better question is "when?"

>unless you believe that there is something about biology that makes it categorically better for certain kinds of computation.There's no reason to believe that's the case.

How about the fact that we don't actually know enough about the human mind to arrive at this conclusion? (yet)

I'm not convinced AirPods are that "simple" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB_8dGKh9JI

Related NY Times interview https://archive.ph/OUbbU

What The Company Learned About Social Media and Harms to Mental Health from Dozens of Internal Studies Compiled by Bennett Sippel, Nikolaus Greb, Emma Park, Zach Rausch, and Jonathan Haidt at the Tech and Society Lab at NYU Stern. Date launched: January 13, 2026. Last updated: January 13, 2026.

>Apple Intelligence will continue to run on Apple devices and Private Cloud Compute, while maintaining Apple's industry-leading privacy standards.

https://blog.google/company-news/inside-google/company-annou...

Ask the shareholders if they're a joke

Makes sense. Now make protein affordable.

Yes except in this case you can't see who is "swinging the hammer" bc they're hiding on the internet

This is the best supply chain in the world. They ship _because_ they're selling.

Or maybe they make better phones?

This legit sounds like a bot reply

>it is never a win when a powerful company or government lobbies for a specific carve out for only it's customers or its country.

This wasn't an "Apple only" law -- it would have affected all platforms with data on customers that live outside the UK.

>This isn't a win, this is solidifying and reinforcing the idea that different laws should exist for different classes of people - those who can afford to make the government look the other way and those that can't.

Corporations are not people. The people can afford to vote out politicians making laws that go against the will of the people.

I don't see how this is any different from variation/choices in other lifestyle products. Many consumers are sophisticated and appreciate choice.

"AGI achieved internally" -- Sam Altman

But can it say “I don’t know” if ya know, it doesn’t

Sounds like confirmation bias in action