HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

throwup

1,027 karma · joined August 16, 2022

If you're looking at my profile, you must be badly procrastinating. Get off HN and get back to work!
submissionscomments
throwup··on 10 KB Club: Curated list of websites whose home pages do not exceed 10 KB size
Based on this comment I'm almost certain you have faster hardware than most of your users.
throwup··on Tea: A new package manager from the creator of brew
https://www.binance.com/en/blog/ecosystem/binance-labs-leads...

> Packages will be released on‐chain as NFTs with their dependency metadata included.

:thinking_emoji:

throwup··on Qatar to ban beer at World Cup stadiums two days before tournament starts
Or perhaps more productively, file a chargeback. I hope you used a credit card.
throwup··on Is this the end of crypto?
Illegal transactions are also 11-12% of the USA's economy.[1]

In 2019, forex volume was $6.6T per day [2], or $1716T per year. Meanwhile global GDP was only $87.5T [3]. In other words, almost 95% of global currency volume is speculation. Why would anyone use currencies that are mainly used for speculation?

Both the traditional and crypto economies are reflections of human behavior, but because crypto is more transparent, you can see it for yourself. And a lot of people don't like what they see. But it's not a new problem nor unique to new currencies or technologies.

[1]: https://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets/032916/how-big...

[2]: https://www.financemagnates.com/institutional-forex/executio...

[3]: https://www.statista.com/statistics/268750/global-gross-dome...

throwup··on Is this the end of crypto?
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3942181

> For example, illegal transactions, scams and gambling together make up less than 3% of volume.

throwup··on Is this the end of crypto?
I'll add this to the list.

http://bitcoinisdead.org/

throwup··on Crypto dominoes fall in the wake of FTX's collapse
Companies like FTX collapsing do negatively affect the space. But what's even worse is companies like FTX that are irresponsible and haven't collapsed yet. What's a guy to do?

I warned people last year not to use FTX. Now FTX is gone. Please tell me what feelings I'm allowed to feel now that they're finally gone.

throwup··on Crypto dominoes fall in the wake of FTX's collapse
If a person wants an industry to succeed, they will want companies in the industry to behave honestly. And if a company behaves dishonestly, they will want the dishonest company to leave that industry. Why is that so hard to believe?
throwup··on Electric ferry uses a long extension cord [video]
He's always been the "one take" guy for me. And it's not as easy as it looks--he'll spend 10 minutes wandering seemingly-aimlessly around London, and pass by a certain landmark within 5 seconds of mentioning it in his script (which he also memorized). It's bananas and I don't think many people even consciously notice. That's why he's so happy when he nails it. I think it's cute! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgRRFRaMFcc
throwup··on Is Rust stack-efficient yet?
My suggestion would not measure the copies themselves, but it would count how many bytes are the source/destination of copies (of course incl. other things like parameters/etc). It's not the exact same metric, but it does still help answer the question in the title. I would expect the two numbers to be highly correlated when building the same binary with different versions of the compiler.

It would also solve some practical problems mentioned in the page like the complexity of the setup and the speed of statistics gathering.

throwup··on Is Rust stack-efficient yet?
I've run into frustrating stack overflows in seemingly trivial non-recursive code, so I appreciate this effort!

I wonder if it might be simpler to track stack sizes statically instead of using runtime instrumentation. What I mean is, for example on x86_64, the function prologue has a stack reservation in the form of `sub rbp, 0x168`. So we can easily tell that the function uses 0x168 bytes of stack space. Just add those numbers up for every function in a crate, and you have a score. Track that number over time for a set of common crates.

throwup··on Genesis' Crypto-Lending Unit Is Suspending Withdrawals in Wake of FTX Collapse
> What incentivizes people to spend their Bitcoin today (whether as a business expense or for their cost of living) rather than holding on to them until tomorrow, getting richer passively?

The same thing that incentivizes people to spend their USD today instead of passively getting rich using VTSAX

throwup··on Genesis' Crypto-Lending Unit Is Suspending Withdrawals in Wake of FTX Collapse
You have a point, but I think you're underestimating how "very easy" of a process an audit is. It's a mountain of time-consuming work for everyone involved. Their audits are encompassing more and more each time. They've talked about wanting to go public, at which point they would need to disclose everything quarterly, so I think it's likely they'll work their way up to your standards one day. But even if I'm wrong, if you keep your keys to yourself, none of this matters.
throwup··on Electric ferry uses a long extension cord [video]
I think it's because he records his videos in one take :)
throwup··on Genesis' Crypto-Lending Unit Is Suspending Withdrawals in Wake of FTX Collapse
You're right, there is no way to cryptographically prove that there are no contracts external to the blockchain. The audit is from a purely "not your keys, not your coins" perspective. And there's no way to prove they won't go get some USD loans tomorrow either, since you can't cryptographically prove the future.

Your defense against these tail risks is to remember, "not your keys, not your coins", and self-custody when you're not actively exchanging. In the end you do have to hope that the < 1 hour it takes you to exchange your coins and transfer them back to your own wallet doesn't overlap with the moment they decide to torpedo their 10+ year old business with no prior warning or red flags. But these are infinitesimally small tail risks.

throwup··on Genesis' Crypto-Lending Unit Is Suspending Withdrawals in Wake of FTX Collapse
You're 100% right, and that bad feeling you have is a sign that you understand where both sides are coming from. This is why so many people say "not your keys, not your coin". Giving up control of your keys is never the best option, but if that's what you choose to do, audits might help you make the least bad choice out of those available.
throwup··on Genesis' Crypto-Lending Unit Is Suspending Withdrawals in Wake of FTX Collapse
Their audits operate on the principle of "your keys = your coin". That's good enough for me. But you have a point and that's why they listed it as a caveat. If you want them to open the rest of their books, I guess we'll just have to wait until they go public.
throwup··on Genesis' Crypto-Lending Unit Is Suspending Withdrawals in Wake of FTX Collapse
Come on man. That's an old article. It was true of the audit being reported on at the time, but their most recent audit was more comprehensive. Again, just open the links I posted if you want to see how things have changed since then.
throwup··on Genesis' Crypto-Lending Unit Is Suspending Withdrawals in Wake of FTX Collapse
I'm still not quite sure you're after, but I guess it would be this quote on page 3:

> 14) Compare the total liabilities from the Client Liability Report extracted from Kraken’s production database as observed within Procedure 5 to the total assets controlled by the Kraken custodied addresses (the “In-Kind Assets”) as of the specified date and time of the assessment time and calculate the collateralization ratio based on the In-Kind Asset-to-Client Liability mapping provided by Kraken Management

throwup··on Genesis' Crypto-Lending Unit Is Suspending Withdrawals in Wake of FTX Collapse
Full of misinformation.

> They only verify BTC and ETH

Click the link and you see this isn't true: "ADA ADA.S BTC BTC.M DOT DOT.S DOT.P etc etc"

> they don't audit liabilities at all

All liabilities were verified by the auditors and included in the merkle tree, and as mentioned, all users can independently verify that their specific liabilities are present. What more would you expect?

> the audit they did last December was the second in 8 years

Their most recent audit was end of Q2 this year. They do audits semi-annually.

throwup··on Windows Subsystem For Linux a.k.a. WSL 1.0.0 released
Because, you see, if power transmission is optional, we can manufacture a cable without it for 37¢ instead of 39¢. Think of the savings!

... yes, I hate it too :(

throwup··on Genesis' Crypto-Lending Unit Is Suspending Withdrawals in Wake of FTX Collapse
Kraken does at least. AIUI their auditor is given a snapshot of all account balances at a particular point in time, and builds a merkle tree. You can then reconstruct your expected merkle leaf and verify that your specific account was included in the tree. You can verify on the auditor's website, or you can do it by hand. Kraken's help page even has code snippets in Python/Go/etc to make it easy!

More info:

https://www.kraken.com/proof-of-reserves

https://proof-of-reserves.trustexplorer.io/clients/kraken

throwup··on Windows Subsystem For Linux a.k.a. WSL 1.0.0 released
This is WSL 2 1.0.0.

Microsoft is the worst company on the planet when it comes to version numbers. Don't even get me started about "Xbox One".

throwup··on Genesis' Crypto-Lending Unit Is Suspending Withdrawals in Wake of FTX Collapse
1. Some exchanges are irresponsible and fail. Some exchanges are not irresponsible and do not fail. If you do a minimum of due diligence, it's not hard to tell the responsible from the irresponsible. Do they regularly publish independently-verifiable audits? Or are they spending boatloads money on stadium sponsorships?

2. If you're using an exchange for exchanging currencies (as opposed to speculation) you can send your money there, exchange it, and immediately send it back out. You're only exposed for at most an hour or two. If you've chosen a well-reputed exchange that's been around for 10+ years, chances are effectively nil that it suddenly disappears during that small window with no warning signs beforehand.

throwup··on Genesis' Crypto-Lending Unit Is Suspending Withdrawals in Wake of FTX Collapse
Sorry, 90%? Why not 100%?
throwup··on NYPD Arrests Cyclist for Uncovering Obscured License Plate, Lets Driver Go
Can we not talk about crypto on literally every post, thanks
throwup··on Vast Majority of People Who Invest in Bitcoin Inevitably Lose Money, Study Shows
It's pretty hard to estimate the number of users from just on-chain data, since change from a transaction usually goes to a fresh address. That makes every single transaction appear to create a fresh "wallet".
throwup··on Vast Majority of People Who Invest in Bitcoin Inevitably Lose Money, Study Shows
Yep, this factoid goes in cycles just like the price. If anyone is interested in diving deeper, the indicator to look at is called MVRV (Market Value to Realized Value). During time periods when it's less than 1, the average investor is carrying a loss, and > 1 means carrying a profit. Historically every halving it has spent some time below 1, and this time around we're right on schedule.

https://charts.woobull.com/bitcoin-mvrv-ratio/

throwup··on PayPal inactivity fee
> What is the inactivity fee?

> PayPal customers enjoy a range of benefits associated with their accounts, including a full suite of tools, products, blah blah blah blah

Jesus Christ, get to the point and just answer the question already. Whoever wrote this absolutely knows the company is doing something slimy.

throwup··on Crypto exchange AAX suspends withdrawals
Not your keys, not your cheese. It's sad how many people have to learn this the hard way.
← PreviousPage 3 of 6Next →