tomtom1337

> The final memory usage on release of the model should be 6.9 Gb of VRAM.

Do they actually mean GB or Gb? Can anyone confirm?

Seconded. I don't understand what they meant by two hands/fingers.

For what it's worth, I get CAPTCHA a lot on expressvpn and nordvpn too. (Switched from the former a few months ago when my subscription ran out).

From 2018: <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16076041>

> We’re recently running two machines (master and standby) at M5 Hosting. All of HN runs on a single box, nothing exotic: CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2637 v4 @ 3.50GHz (3500.07-MHz K8-class CPU) FreeBSD/SMP: 2 package(s) x 4 core(s) x 2 hardware threads Mirrored SSDs for data, mirrored magnetic for logs (UFS) We get around 4M requests a day.

Alternative phrasing: Full-office pays 52.6% of full-remote. Or "about half".

I've upvoted you, and you may be right, but your last sentence could really be used as an argument for the opposite case - if the light bleeds into the background, then surely if the background is light, then it would bleed into the dark letters? And the effect would be enhanced since there is much more light on the screen in light mode?

This is a really creative website! Nice work!

I'd recommend checking out polars as an alternative to pandas - https://github.com/pola-rs/polars

It has a rather different api, and is significantly faster. Highly recommend it.

So it would seem! Thanks!

You would actually have more noise, or at least, not less noise. There is readout noise associated with reading the information out from each pixel. Using one bigger pixel would give you less noise than four smaller ones :)

The Rayleigh criterion above is exactly what is used to answer the question you're asking :) it tells you what size objects you can resolve with a given wavelength of light, which if you think about it in a different manner also tells you what the smallest useful pixel size you can have is. Two smaller pixels next to one another would be able to distinguish no more information than a combined one.

(Totally agree!)

You mean "disagree" here though - "digress" means that you step away from the topic for a moment.

This is super interesting and extremely helpful! But who wrote this?

Your imgur link isn't working for me. I'm getting an "oops we can't find the image".

Your suggestion is a really good one. We have channels with several hundred people in it, and there threads are a must. In the smaller team channels I often reply out-of-thread, since it doesn't matter.

Agreed that they could type that explicitly in the readme, but just so you know, github displays this sort of info in the horizontal bar diagram if you scroll a bit down on the repo page. 93.5 % typescript.

I love that I can read the whole page without scrolling.

Thank you! Arcsecond is a 2d measurement! One star is coming within a small distance of the other star when looking at the projected image!

This is super interesting! I'm surprised the articles introduction didn't include a single image demonstrating an imaging system that uses a lens, though. Seems like it would fit nicely to highlight the problem.

As a suggestion to help you with your quest - try polarised sunglasses. I used them with my M1 mac this summer quite successfully! The macbook screen is polarised so that the screen light goes straight through the sunglasses, while the surrounding sunlight gets dimmed.