and when people like me say things like this, inevitably someone like you comes along to tell them they are dangerous for saying it out loud. In fact, the government was actively censoring people from being able to express this on social media.
1,173 karma · joined February 13, 2012
and when people like me say things like this, inevitably someone like you comes along to tell them they are dangerous for saying it out loud. In fact, the government was actively censoring people from being able to express this on social media.
I also had covid this year, zero boosters, had a mild fever and sniffle for two days. not sure what you are demonstrating with this anecdote. or what goalposts you think I moved. the "milder symptom" stuff all came long after it was obvious that the covid shots were not doing what had been promised. that is what I would call moving the goalposts
it was incredibly destructive for trust in the medical establishment to oversell / mandate it and market aggressively as "safe and effective". while most vaccine risks are in the 10s per 100k or 1M, nearly everybody knows somebody else who had an adverse reaction to one of the covid shots.
nearly everybody observed that you still get and spread covid anyway. that is disconnected from the aggressive messaging from the CDC and the fear and shame campaign from the last US administration.
criticism of a specific vaccine or policy does not make someone an anti-vaxxer that moves goalposts. the establishment is responsible for the skepticism it engendered against itself by its hubris
Apropos, I had chronic pain throughout this experience. I thought it was just aging, irreversible, and something that compounded my hopelessness. It's very surprising to be 10 years older now but feel 20 years younger. Books like "The Body Keeps the Score" or "Healing Back Pain" used to seem woo to me, but now I am convicted that health comes from within as much or more than it does from without.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFKx8nCl1Vw
It is hard for me to distinguish between the functional simplicity of desktop computing in that era, with the overall excitement that the explosion of connectivity brought to the world. The internet was a lot of fun and had so many surprising corners. Practically all of it was personal, niche, or experimental content for awhile.
I wonder if Windows 9X was really all that exceptional, or if it was just what people remember driving with as they navigated the new world.
The best modern equivalent to that desktop paradigm I've found is LXQt, although when I use it I find I kind of miss some of the accouterments of the modern desktops.
https://www.govtech.com/civic/what-is-18f.html
Key Projects:
Beta.FEC.gov: Revamped the Federal Election Commission's website for easier record access.
MyUSCIS: Simplified the immigration process for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).
USCIS ICAM Development: Developed a login and identity verification system for USCIS users.
eRegulations Platform: Made regulations more accessible and understandable.
College Scorecard: Provided clear data on college costs, graduation rates, debt, and post-college earnings.
Cloud.gov: Offers a platform for government teams to develop and manage web applications efficiently.
U.S. Web Design Standards: Created open-source UI components for consistent federal website experiences16.
people who perform well on intelligence tests may not present as generally intelligent
I am sharing my personal opinion
The opposition will always employ fear tactics like socialist, marxist, fascist, science denier etc
The question is to what degree. I am saying there's no analytical argument for 2%.
I think most people would agree that 10% or 50% inflation would be bad. But why is 2% better than 1% or 0%?. Why is 1% better than -1%? it depends on the time horizon. higher inflation today will cause more economic activity, higher inflation in the long run encourages debt and misallocation of resources.
there is deflation that comes from shrinking of the monetary base and there is deflation that arises out of productivity gains
often the "deflation" observed in bad economies is a symptom rather than the cause E.g. there were a few months of official deflation in the US following the global financial crisis, but this followed from the crash rather than caused it.
We welcome and celebrate deflation in technological goods (cars, electronics), apparel but are constantly warned about the dangers of deflation and why "some" inflation is good.
What is the argument for why 1-2% _deflation_ in housing, education, and healthcare would be bad?
Prettiest horse in the glue factory
would it be bad if the cost of college education, housing, or healthcare decreased?
why would it be bad if the cost of groceries fell to what it used to be (deflation)?
Merry Sky is a good homage but I've never evaluated it much for accuracy: https://merrysky.net/forecast/new%20york/us
College either. Tuition is priced as is, but what about people who pay many multiples of the original tuition in interest expenses over the years? not counted in CPI. Tuition inflation for a person with the means to pay out of pocket is much lower than someone who finances their education.
pretty wild to think that surplus was in part driven by the internet boom. now we have some kind of stock market boom while the federal deficit is 10% of total GDP and national debt is growing by a trillion dollars (a million times a million) every 100 days or so.
China can change their policy easily with respect to reciprocity
I always understood that it was its open source nature being a successor to the S language that gave it traction
1) tidyverse makes prodding and plotting my data faster and more enjoyable. when I am prototyping a model I'll sometimes do the groundwork in R and then migrate the production version to python
2) I can't seem to write data wrangling code in py that is as aesthetically pleasing and easy to reinterpret later. could just be that I started in R, but while the methods in pandas "work" I don't always totally understand why they work the way they do. with tidy it works the way I expect and feels easier to read back and iterate on
what's wrong is wrong; this isn't good policy. someone reported on it, people are finding out and they don't like it.
probably twice as slow as driving, but 10x more enjoyable
3 hours to commute 3 miles is literally 1 mile an hour. about the speed of a baby's crawl