-18 karma · joined March 14, 2019
No wonder the world is running towards Python and serverless as fast as they can...
- but we aren't selling you a finished product (didn't we mention that?), just a base framework that needs customization. Cue fly-in-fly-out consultants for exorbitant daily rates.
- to lower costs, why not send your own staff to our "university" for thousands of dollars for a 5 day class?
- hire said staff to become consultants after customer pays for their training. They don't appear out of thin air!
- when customer finally ditches product, blame them for lack of investment and use contacts to complain at highest levels of bureaucracy.
- rinse and repeat.
A tried and tested formula.
OP seems to be trying to cope with NFS errors....but if you are using mmap on NFS you have bigger problems...
Murder is a negative to society.
A loser going to Harvard is not, may even improve society if they study well.
> Japanese prosecutors subject suspects to up to eight hours of daily questioning while they are detained in a bid to obtain a confession, shutting off access to their family and barring them from obtaining legal assistance during the questioning. And according to the popular narrative, it’s all done capriciously, with the nefarious machinations of the state lurking behind.
This is true in almost every western country except the US. England, Canada, Australia etc you have no right to a lawyer during questioning. Police will destroy and cover up evidence in attempt to frame people on a regular basis, and basically join the prosecution from day 1 instead of investigating crime. They seek certain sorts of convictions to please their politics masters. They much rather a rape conviction than a false accusation conviction for example. They will prosecute people against the weight of evidence, where in fact the only evidence is exculpatory.
Consider the case of Mark Pearson. Falsely accused of a rape after bumping into a woman in a subway station. Video evidence proved it wasn't possible, so police slowed down the footage to make it appear it did happen. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/cps-slowed-down-...
Now if this same thing happened in Japan, if they saw the video footage that basically proved it was a false accusation, do you think they would have acted as capriciously as UK police, or maybe charged the woman instead?
The narcissism of the Western political/legal class knows no bounds.
- they have no evidence they ever had a car
- bank records do not show evidence of any purchases of a car or insurance
- registration records do not support the person had a car registered to them
The yes the police will probably start investigating them for fraud as they do many of thousands of times are year, and they may well seek forensic computer evidence.
That's exactly what a criminal investigation is. They keep fishing until they find probative evidence. The creative ways police investigate certain unsolved crimes puts most fishing expeditions to shame.
Unless of course you aren't interested in the truth but want to railroad people accused of very specific crimes for political reasons...
We know the police do, as they admit as much. They explicitly say they have a policy of believing the victim at which point they sign up to the prosecution rather than investigating both sides. This is not in dispute - they openly admit it, usually as a reassurance to "victims".
By the courts? Well if you look at the carriage of a trial, the fact the accuser gets to give evidence over a TV, advice to juries about "myths" (but never the myth that women never lie about rape), tight controls over what evidence the defense can even raise or how they can test the evidence against them (but not the prosecution)...the system is stacked against the accused in a way that is miles away from a fair trial. Simply allowing a trial without evidence could be said to be guilty until proven innocent.
The jury? Well that varies, but given the proportion of not guilty verdicts, thankfully not most of the time. Juries aren't perfect, but the reason we have them is to protect the accused from people like you.
If you had an ounce of self awareness you might put yourself in Mark Pearson's shoes and ask, if that was you, would you still be shilling for the CPS?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/man-falsely-...
So 3500 NOT GUILTY verdicts huh? And none of them could possibly be false accusation?
In the UK they need permission from 2 senior prosecutors to DROP a rape prosecution.
But the need permission from the DPP to even START prosecuting a false rape accusation.
LOL so a bunch of ivory tower academics who have never left the cushy confines of campus let alone entered a battlefield come up with impractical and useless inventions that got dumped within a day. What's the bet men on the ground hated them! And the real solution came from some comms officer who knows a bit about soldering and sensors (and the reality of jungle warfare) probably.
Im surprised the DOD put up with them for so long.
The things physicists will say instead of "we don't know the answer".
When you say it's next generation and deserving of the title PS5....whatever.
Has any of Sony's next-generation consoles just been "spec-upgraded" versions of previous ones? What a weird comment.
Great, and now you have the other problem the MCAS was supposed to mitigate (the tendency of the MAX to do backflips).
Err....it's been NT all along.