574 karma · joined February 8, 2021
Seems impractical and difficult to enforce. Will be a stigma and potential realisation towards those who try and get their management fined.
Except where legally required (e.g. government provided attorney) it should come as no surprise that people are loyal to whoever pays them.
HR are paid by the company, and thus they will act in the interests of said company.
This is especially bad in Ubers case given the extortionate service charge that they add. It’s not like it’s an ad supported free user that brings hardly any revenue.
There’s a few of these forks popping up, including https://freenginx.org (see: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/02/nginx...).
Not sure if this is a good thing, can’t help but feel it’d be better to consolidate these efforts.
When you “Rent” you are given an explicit warning that it is a time bound transaction, so if the same potentially applies to “Buying” a movie a warning should be equally visible and not hidden away in 100 pages of legal jargon.
You’ve got a strong signal you might be filmed with the Vision Pro in the form of a gigantic headset, if you’re that worried avoid people with them on.
But I earn enough to pay for my content so I make a decision to do that.