17,947 karma · joined April 15, 2013
> dumbest imaginable users.
They are often one and the same.
Capital waste is only capital waste if the physical goods that were built are no longer useful for anyone. Otherwise, it's only a waste for the people who lent money.
I mean, they should be. It's a transformative technology that is doing something that was science-fiction five years ago, and it going to make a few people trillionaires, and it's not entirely clear where it will leave the rest of us.
That doesn't mean that you should, like, be rushing to be a bagholder.
Rural Japan expects cash fares, yes, but rural Japan also expects cash for everything else, so if you're in rural Japan, you should have enough cash on you to cover all your expenses.
In four weeks of travel all over the country (from Tokyo down to towns of <700 people, and every step in between), I don't think I've seen a single machine/system/vendor there that demanded exact payments, without providing change.
I'm not sure why the OP wanted hotel staff to exchange money, when ATMs are plentiful, and will all provide JPY when you stick a debit or credit card in them. (If using a CC, make sure you have a positive balance to avoid incurring CC cash advance fees).
Honestly, once I understood that I should link my HSR tickets to my Suica card, my travels through it became very simple.
In the long term, the US is far more likely to turn into China than not.
[1] Who have both the training, the ability, and the incentive to file challenges if they observe irregularities.
They sure have a lot of that capital.
Or the lack of one for a bunch of feds pinning a man to the ground and executing him. And then scattering like fucking roaches after they do so.
But you know all this. Why are you carrying water for it?
His dad's doing time for a coup and an attempted assassination, and his brother's been convicted of coercing the judiciary, by getting Trump to punish Brazil for his dad's conviction. It's a perfectly normal sort of family, this stuff could have happened to anyone.
Two years ago, half the voters were explicitly asked if they wanted more of it, and they said 'absolutely'!
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes..?
1. Some C-suite asshole wants headcount in your division reduced by, say, 5% next year. He has zero visibility into anyone's performance, or any of the projects anyone is actually working on.
2. His subordinate directors could do random, or targeted layoffs to hit that 5%, but this ruins morale for everyone who survives, and is rather awful for those that don't.
3. ...Or, they could make this offer, let people leave on their own, try to convince any stars who want to take it to stay, don't do any backfill. Then, hopefully, between the voluntary layoffs and no backfill, you might hit that 5% reduction, and not have to do involuntary layoffs. (Or if you do, they would be much smaller.)
4. This is less disruptive for teams and managers, because with voluntary layoffs, they have time to plan for these people leaving, instead of showing up to work on Thursday, and being told that 5 people on their team were given the pink slip this morning.
5. This is also, obviously, less disruptive for employees who take the offer (as they can control their exit, and get a payout), and less disruptive for anyone who doesn't take the offer (lower odds of showing up to work on Thursday, and getting a pink slip).