259 karma · joined November 2, 2022
When rewriting the entire codebase is very quick and cheap, why bother iterating on small components?
Given TFA accepts that error correction is the bottleneck for progress, and the gap between any and lots of error correction is small, and we presently have close to 0 error correction then nothing has practically changed with reduced qubit requirements.
Of course, it’s totally fine to have and announce a change of view on the topic, though I don’t see how the Google paper materially requires it.
The claim of artificial price inflation with Jump sounds more questionable but TFA doesn’t seem to put it front and centre
I find having a name to certain phenomena makes them easier to understand and apply in the wild, and will definitely think ‘barker’ in the future haha
Do you have any source for this?
I’m assuming (because HN) that you had the USA in mind, and it doesn’t pass the sniff test for me given that US insurance fees are more than single digit percentages higher than other high quality care countries with privatised healthcare systems
scroll down a bit for the STUNless/TURNless bit
I just read they have 2000 employees which is also puzzling to me
I did the Torsten Ball books in Kotlin rather than Go and learned a lot
Central bank != government in most developed countries
>so long as all currencies inflate at a similar rate; the foreign exchange rates will be stable.
Exchange rates are not stable for a variety of reasons that are not purely supply-related
Edit: in fact, before widespread TLS practically everybody could see them…
It’s hard to learn a lot of these lessons without going through it, so I really appreciate you sharing