78 karma · joined April 27, 2011
China overtook the United States at the end of 2008
to become New Zealand's second largest trading partner,
with bilateral trade amounting to $9.4 billion in the
year ended December 2009.
source: http://www.nzdmo.govt.nz/publications/nzefo/2010/17.htmThe second linked document - New Zealand's submission - was quite readable and seems fairly rational.
The essays by NZ organisations opposing TPP were also pretty much all interesting reads.
As far as i'm aware the current solution for this is still to use Flash, or a native application. I'd be happy to be wrong. In any case making a phone entirely controllable via web standards will ensure that such capabilities are avilable and proven.
If anyone has more info on webcam integration with HTML5 video, this stackoverflow post could use some love: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1318834/whats-the-status-...
http://saladeprensa.telefonica.com/jsp/base.jsp?contenido=/j...
"This is the kind of stuff we do not like, vote for us if you also do not like it."
I think it targets their core demographic quite well. Whether it is mock outrage or not is a moot point.
""The $I cost is the most subjective of the four and depends on how much stock a player puts in "doing the right thing," (so to speak) or whether they even see any moral integrity in the choice at all.""
I agree on the value-added point though, there are often services game makers can provide which make the official copy more attractive to players.
When something is stolen, the original owner no longer has posession of the stolen object. If the story were about money or physical property, "stealing" would be appropriate. It is not.
The word "copying" is quite adequate. In this case, direct copying is obviously poor behaviour. It betrays a lack of capability on the part of the copyer. This story would have had the same emotional impact, had it used the correct term.
Using the word "stealing" mires the story in the intricacies of digital copyright debate, which is not what this is about. It is about a startup not doing its own work, and thus demonstrating inability.
For example to "Develop new models to accurately predict the market response to large trades." is valued at $10,000.
A quick web search turns up: https://affiliate-program.amazon.com/
For physics and math students I recommend starting at page 9. The 8 pages of rationale seem a little unnecessary, with the math mostly speaking for itself.
I'm looking forward to giving this a more detailed read later.
This article seems very helpful for simply enabling someone with Python experience to learn Haskell.
source: https://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/09/opinion/09lee.html
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20110427052238659
Disregarding your comments on patriotism and the USPTO (which I don't fully disagree with), the disturbing part about Google being unable to buy these patents, is that they appear to have been actively collaborated against in the auctions. Not being able to build a substantial patent portfolio denies them the ability to countersue in response to frivolous patent threats against Android, which I assume is a large part of why Google was willing to bid so highly for them.
Personally the part of the recent auction I found most disturbing was that the patents weren't sold to the highest bidder, they were sold to a conglomeration of bidders, some of which had already tapped out. To make a parallel with an art auction, it would be like half of the bidding floor banding together simply to ensure that another promiment bidder didn't get the piece. Possibly a valid action, but possibly anticompetitive, depending on the situation.
Even simple things like trying to find out what "$" does, are effectively impossible to search for. Constructs such as "||>" are a nightmare.
I finally progressed a little after finding a Haskell "cheat sheet" and reading it thoroughly.
The "cheat sheet" was 14 pages long, with three columns per page. And to top it off, it still didn't explain what many of the operators did, rendering whole sections illegible.
Still, like I say, it's the best learning resource I found.
http://cheatsheet.codeslower.com/ for the curious.
half tau r^2 is a fine equation for an area.