zhaphod

Given how vehemently the Senators were in forcing NASA to create a second award for HLS, I wonder why there is no backup for SLS+Orion.

as long as we ignore the CO2 dumped by Camry/Prius and its cohorts across the industry causing existential crisis hey they will beat others on cost/mile.

He may promise the stars but does deliver the moon. i am just waiting to see who else is even delivering the moon.

Problem with NUCs is the thermal limitation.

only if names affect the performance of the rocket

>> Can't travel cross country,

Unless you want to travel non-stop for 7 to 8 hour plus without taking a break, then you can.

I have an eithical dilemma for you. As of now on an average 33000 ppl are killed in road accidents in USA. Lets say Tesla's or other ICE makers' autopilot reduces this to 20000 deaths. But of those 20000 deaths, say 2000 were purely because of autopilot alogrithm which wouldn't have happened if there was no autopilot. As a regulator what will you do. Approve autopilot because it saved 13000 people or ban it because 2000 were killed just because of it? I know how this will play in media. Unfortunately autopilot will be demonized and most likely will get banned.

>>the reality is that they are gone continue to increase as Tesla delivers more vehicles they actually get more credits,

People completely miss this point (some deliberately so). At least in Europe, as each year progresses, the number of grams/km allowed will keep going down. It is 95g/km for this year. Thos who miss will have to pay a fine. FCA is pooling with Tesla to avoid this. Ford will miss due to fire hazard debacle. So on. Now even if the ICE makers are able to meet 95 gms/kms now, next year it will become harder. ICE innovation is not fast enough to keep up with regulation. Only way to avoid fines is to accelerate the EV+ICE mix. Some will do this not all. And this will hit their profitability. They have huge sunk cost on ICE side. They can't willy nilly junk that investment and move over to EVs. This mostly implies the legacy car makers will have to keep paying fines to EU or to pool with Tesla and subisidies the competitors growth. Win win for Tesla.

Thanks for this. I don't know why people make easily disprovable statements. Do they think their ability to mislead is greater than peoples ability to read financial statements? Furtermore, CNBC brought on the "biggest" bear Gordon Johnson. He used the same technique to mislead. He used Tesla's update that they are now at 840K installed capacity, to claim that they have always been at that capacity and since guidance is to hit 500K, there is a drop in demand. This was a galling attempt to mislead and to prop up his own analysis.

Misleading title. 350-mile versions starts at $112000 and available in Fall-21. $80k version is 250mile and is available from Spring-24.

I am stuck too in my work. I can't quit because of my commitments (also i am too scared to quit and be on my own). Any way. One thing I know is that I do well when I am learning new stuff. So my goal for next 5 years: learn Quantum Computing inside out. This means Physics/Math/Programming in new paradigm. So I have my hands full. So find what makes you feel better and do it. In the meantime, I have found mindless activity like cleaning home boosts mood too.

whatever the value, I hope it stays buried.

You should Google for what Elon thinks about space-based solar energy.

Your comment reminds me of the Star Trek TNG episode Peak Performance. Data wins the rematch by playing to stalemate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_Performance_(Star_Trek:_T...

So what you are saying is a person looks at $4 a gallon and thinks hey lets buy a Tesla which costs $100K. And suddenly the same person will say no reason to buy a Tesla because now a gallon costs $2. This person doesn't sound like the sharpest tool in the set.

Actually context matters here.

If some one from USA/UK/France, for example, learns a new language it definitely is a surprise. May be blows the mind is not the right word.

On the other hand, it is common for people from Southern India to know 4 or 5 languages and it is not surprising.

There is an enormous difference between writing in English and writing like Shakespeare, Hitchens, Rushdie, or Stephen King. When it comes to coding most people confuse learning syntax with writing great software.

Hmm. $90,000 per year. Looks like people in developing world like India are out of luck.

I agree with you. But please do read the article.

How liberating it must feel to him to not give a damn about what anyone thinks about what he says. Good for him.

My take is that there is no meaning of life. We impose our own meaning to get by.

Ok. I will give you that. I said ~18000 which is the suicide/accident number. I should have said ~12000 for homicide. But it doesn't change my argument at all.

So what you are saying is you are ok with 10000+ deaths year over year for many many decades to counteract an extremely remote chance of US federal government behaving like Saddam or Assad? On top of it even if US Feds wanted to murder their own citizens they would have to employ the Army as police are controlled by state government. We all know where the state govt will land if it comes down to killing their citizens. Also, another issue is that Army in US is not mindless enough to obey the Fed govt to kill 100s of 1000s of citizens. And even if they did taking on the US army by militias with their puny machine guns is laughable.

Yes. People kill people. But people don't kill other people with bare hands. May be they do but it would be such a minute fraction that it is not worth talking about. So given that people do need weapons to kill other people which weapon is more destructive given the current statistics. Right now there are about 30000+ gun deaths in USA. Of that about ~18000 are homicides. Which other weapon can cause so many deaths? If we allowed people to carry grenades, C4, tanks, or even nuclear weapons on a regular basis we would see lot more people getting killed. But we don't allow that. Given this scenario allowing free availability of guns is what is causing these many deaths. This is borne out by statistics from other countries which ban such free availability and use of guns. So yes people kill people. But it wont be so easy to kill so many people if guns are restricted to law enforcement officials.

Hmm. I am from India, and most resumes I have seen here, even for people with lot of experience, education section is at the top. I just stuck with that format.

Regarding the correct form of don't panic, I am with you. I have absolutely no clue when it comes to Latin {on the other hand I can talk my way out of any situation in more than a few south Indian languages}. I was fooling around with Google translate and wanted a short form and settled on "ne pavor".

I used the Greek transliteration because I absolutely love how Greek letters look in latex.

Regarding the "h" : When I was choosing the nick name I thought there was an "h" in zaphod and realized the mistake way too late to change it in so many different places.

Any particular reason Education section comes towards the end. Almost all profiles I have seen it is at the top.

PS: What a coincidence I was born on jun 12 too.

Thanks for reviewing. I appreciate it. I will check the suggestion you gave.

Also, looking at my nick name here "zhaphod" you can guess I am a bit of Hitch Hikers nerd. So the most famous quote from DNA is "Don't Panic" which translates to "Ne pavor" in latin. Now write that in greek alphabet you get "νε παβoρ". I usually remove it before I send out my profile to companies.

And who can miss Brett Victors CV:

PDF : http://worrydream.com/#!/cv/bret_victor_resume.pdf

FYI: He is the iPod/iPhone UI designer.

I checked yours. Looks good too. I will use your format and create one more in addition to moderncv.