One additional factor I would love to see: situations where one person is coming on a "late" cofounder (e.g. a basic product has already been made, e.g. with outsourced Eastern European developers, and there is some minor traction).
108 karma · joined June 20, 2009
One additional factor I would love to see: situations where one person is coming on a "late" cofounder (e.g. a basic product has already been made, e.g. with outsourced Eastern European developers, and there is some minor traction).
>Second, condom-only regulation would also encourage a black market in adult film production. So movies featuring no-condom sex would not only still exist, but those actors and actresses would no longer be required to participate in the industry's HIV testing program, increasing the risk of an HIV outbreak in the industry and the population at large. One need only look at prostitution to see what happens when an industry operates underground.
http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2009/08/30/is-depres...
Most won't, but it at least is an easy way to provide this option.
And if people were to implement this strategy, the provided space gives an incentive for those zooming ahead to merge a little sooner rather than risk waiting half a minute for someone to let them in right at the exit. It's been my experience that most of the "cheaters" will merge a little sooner if there's space rather than zoom up right to the end. They'll still be passing you, which is IMO aggravating, but at least things will move a little sooner.
Unfortunately, the law provides no clear definition, just as there's no clear point at which competitive behavior become "anti-competitive."
I'm not sure I'd agree with the statement that it's "VERY hard to make an anti-trust case stick" -- the antitrust laws are used a lot more than you hear about in the regular news (and the government doesn't have to be the one who brings them since you can be sued under the laws). For instance, in 2003 Nestle and Dreyer's Ice Cream were blocked from merging on antitrust grounds because the government defined the market they would gain a large share in as "The Market for Superpremium Ice Cream" (not the market for desserts or the market for ice cream). Many other deals aren't even attempted for fear of antitrust.
Not only that, but you can be found guilty of price fixing even if you didn't have a conversation about prices.
But if you're big enough for this to be a concern, you're already thinking about hiring Washington lobbyists to protect yourself and not reading Hacker News.
What if you have a "female" with high levels of androgens? Do you just say if you are 2 standard deviations within the mean of females you are verifiably female? Which is the cutoff?
I would easily spend 5 or 10 cents to read an interesting article, multiple times per day, especially a well written article from the New York Times or Wall Street Journal.
I've experimented with about 4 different dedicated virtual server type hosts (none of which was EC2), and found differences in page rendering time from 30ms to 180ms, due to things like how much load their servers were dealing with, speed of hard drives, and CPUs used.
Some tests I've seen elsewhere suggest that Mosso has better Write IO than Linode and EC2, while Linode has better read performance than Mosso and EC2.
I guess what I'm saying is that if you want to use a virtual server and performance (rather than just the ability to handle a large number of users) is important, you have to consider more than just the RAM and bandwidth.
It's not super secure, but it really should be secure enough if a website cares about security -- they should be limiting login attempts, and shouldn't be storing them in plain text.
This works best if you can have a separate room as your office, however.
He actually would still be able to sue the other kid. However, his damages would likely be rather small, and thus he would go to small claims court, which is setup to deal with this kind of issue. Probably he could also make a criminal complaint against the other kid if he really wanted.
You would probably have to not use Google, since if they are unable to read your email, that kind of destroys their business model.
In addition, in the paper referred to in the article, there isn't a lot of difference between those on the pill and off (the error bars tended to overlap):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18700206?ordinalpos=1&...
It was also not a random or blind trial: "allocation to the pill/control group was entirely the decision of the volunteers, not the experiments."