342 karma · joined August 15, 2017
Or only if the company providing those goods/services doesn't like what is being said, or who is saying it?
That wasn't an actual Buran, it was a test vehicle used to test the handling of the aircraft for gliding and landing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OK-GLI
Production is only illegal in the same way that tobacco production is illegal - you have to be licences to produce and sell cannabis products.
[0] https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-medica...
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixed_platform [1] https://www.bsee.gov/what-we-do/environmental-focuses/rigs-t...
Yes, that's basically what I'm saying is bad about the statement that backwards passes don't help you score goals.
> Useful backward passes fall into at least two categories. The ones that eventually result in an impect, and the ones that run down the clock at the end of the game.
I think this is almost correct, but I think there is a third category: Backwards passes that immediately result in a shot resulting in a goal. In the example video I posted above, the final pass is backwards and is immediately shot into the net. This doesn't increase impect (ie: Messi dribbles past 4 players, then shoots and scores past 3 more, is only impect +4, according to the article).
> Impect disregards all passes that go backwards or don’t beat any defender. It’s a correct assessment, a pass that doesn’t travel forwards, doesn’t help you score. Can’t argue with that.
This is a really odd statement. Plenty of passes don't go forward but absolutely do increase the likelihood of scoring. For example, the final pass here [0] is backwards, might even allow an additional defender time to track back (-1 packing?) but opens up the space required to take a shot and score.
Open-plan offices have taken off because of a desire to decrease real-estate costs and stuff more employees into the same space.
[0] https://www.theverge.com/2017/11/1/16573820/dji-mavic-pro-pl...
The actual (real, factual) number just is what it is. The only number that can be inflated/suppressed/fudged/faked is the reported number.
> other way around ... likely to be inflated, not suppressed.
If their GDP is actually 10% of what they report, then the reports are inflated.
And this argument is garbage. Individuals accumulating massive amounts of wealth doesn't do any good for society.
How is this helpful in either of these cases? A sniper needs eyes on, a drone operator probably has live video from the drone. I don't see how a TV delay would have any effect.
The manager wants to promote the employee, but she needs permission from the VP. So the manager asks the VP to promote the employee.
How are nuclear submarines vulnerable to a first strike?
Unless the thing is guns, then it doesn't matter how many children are killed.