…we were the only customer there. There is no way in hell there isn’t something dodgy afoot. Would be surprised if they have 50 bucks of legitimate revenue a day
27,425 karma · joined October 3, 2010
…we were the only customer there. There is no way in hell there isn’t something dodgy afoot. Would be surprised if they have 50 bucks of legitimate revenue a day
Think metadata in a ZFS array or database writes.
Also crazy endurance - often an order of magnitude beyond even enterprise nvmes.
...and because the things are basically un-killable thanks to endurance you can safely pick up 2nd hand used ones.
So they're a neat trick if used in precisely the right application. Hence:
>some fraction of technologists
>would've been awesome if only Intel hadn't killed it.
Maybe - it would presumably have improved further for niche cases, but doubt it would have conquered mainstream markets.
eg Gemini enterprise has a note under each chat session explicitly saying it’s not used to improve the models
You can’t have a unicorn valuation built on a simple offline client.
This is basically standard SV play book - first step is „fix“ it to have a cloud component/account. Then store some of the data in cloud only - say for example for team sharing or a „workspace“. Then make some features paid only. Then ramp up the enshitification till metrics show it’s saturated and users will bear no more
On both frontiers and open. And lately the gap has been closing so if anything yeeting Anthropic etc is getting more viable over time
And it'll carry 10gig just fine.
Good stuff even though it's a bit of a pain to route it along a path that makes sense, has the right bend radius & doesn't get squished by doors etc.
Currently trying to decide whether to do the same for other rooms.
This is giving singularity is near vibes.
I’d rather buy a smart TV, never connect it to the internet than trade down on specs
If expectations were static you’d be fine with qwen 2.5…but nobody sane says that today.
It’s a moving target thus we need open weights to move
Unlikely given how trivial it is to DIY this (I think...haven't myself but from afar it seems within avg hn crowd reach)
Given pace of advance I'm not convinced this is a winning strategy. The models of today (open or not) are way smarter than those of a year ago.
...so we really do need open models to keep pace, not just be statically competitive at a given point in time
5GB of bonsai weights end up being similar to 5GB of QAT weights even when one is derived from a 27B and the other from an 8B
What a load of horseshit. A model running on a ESP32 running off a questionable powerbank supply with dodgy coding and worse storage reliability can do that.
The only thing anyone cares about is whether the (economic)math works on put AI in space.
Bit like warthunder guys can't help but leak classified info
I can sorta see them suppressing instructions for say bioweapons (that seems fair to me), but this demonstrates that they'll bend for corporate interests.
Haven't really done much research, but this resonates - the vibes on these recent news reports felt very off.
It felt engineered frankly, which makes me quite suspicious in a world where everyone seems to be pushing for encryption backdoors. The one email provider famous for strong encryption suddenly gets a broad PR across entire media landscape?
...zero evidence but the whole thing just feels off AF
Nothing against porn, but given a platform that's what you pick to blast into the world?