eg Gemini enterprise has a note under each chat session explicitly saying it’s not used to improve the models
27,384 karma · joined October 3, 2010
eg Gemini enterprise has a note under each chat session explicitly saying it’s not used to improve the models
You can’t have a unicorn valuation built on a simple offline client.
This is basically standard SV play book - first step is „fix“ it to have a cloud component/account. Then store some of the data in cloud only - say for example for team sharing or a „workspace“. Then make some features paid only. Then ramp up the enshitification till metrics show it’s saturated and users will bear no more
On both frontiers and open. And lately the gap has been closing so if anything yeeting Anthropic etc is getting more viable over time
And it'll carry 10gig just fine.
Good stuff even though it's a bit of a pain to route it along a path that makes sense, has the right bend radius & doesn't get squished by doors etc.
Currently trying to decide whether to do the same for other rooms.
This is giving singularity is near vibes.
I’d rather buy a smart TV, never connect it to the internet than trade down on specs
If expectations were static you’d be fine with qwen 2.5…but nobody sane says that today.
It’s a moving target thus we need open weights to move
Unlikely given how trivial it is to DIY this (I think...haven't myself but from afar it seems within avg hn crowd reach)
Given pace of advance I'm not convinced this is a winning strategy. The models of today (open or not) are way smarter than those of a year ago.
...so we really do need open models to keep pace, not just be statically competitive at a given point in time
5GB of bonsai weights end up being similar to 5GB of QAT weights even when one is derived from a 27B and the other from an 8B
What a load of horseshit. A model running on a ESP32 running off a questionable powerbank supply with dodgy coding and worse storage reliability can do that.
The only thing anyone cares about is whether the (economic)math works on put AI in space.
Bit like warthunder guys can't help but leak classified info
I can sorta see them suppressing instructions for say bioweapons (that seems fair to me), but this demonstrates that they'll bend for corporate interests.
Haven't really done much research, but this resonates - the vibes on these recent news reports felt very off.
It felt engineered frankly, which makes me quite suspicious in a world where everyone seems to be pushing for encryption backdoors. The one email provider famous for strong encryption suddenly gets a broad PR across entire media landscape?
...zero evidence but the whole thing just feels off AF
Nothing against porn, but given a platform that's what you pick to blast into the world?
idk to me that just seems intuitively like something you'd need to have to be credible? Cold is a different story...but how can hot not be covered?
The more countries are in this game the better for us all.
Much like other stuff when there isn't enough competition the consumer gets wrecked