At least for Anthropic, their article states they've vastly overgrown Meta's and Google's pace.
I think their article reads a bit differently, they haven't optimised git, they've ditched it in favour of a new ~~CVS~~ VCS.
2,814 karma · joined August 16, 2022
I think their article reads a bit differently, they haven't optimised git, they've ditched it in favour of a new ~~CVS~~ VCS.
They can stop, it does not matter, there will be others ready to contribute.
It is a ruthless reality but you have to preserve the most precious resource in FOSS which currently is maintainers.
It has been shown times and times against that removing adult content from the training source (at least for diffusion models), results in generally lower-quality output, even outside of adult-content, particularly in terms of representing human bodies.
Similarly it states value comes from either work or land, but value can also be created out of thin air. It is called branding.
Especially for France and its luxury industry. You take two identical handbag, one is from LV, the other an unknown brand, one will cost 1,500$, the other 150$.
But even being based in Switzerland I believe there’s some inter-countries agreements, so it would not be practical.
What? You can definitely publish about it in a free society, and cash anonymity has nothing to do with it.
I understand your argument as "it's easier to botch an implementation in C++ than in Rust", which is true and that is actually an argument in favour of Rust.
I strongly believe it is harder to write a C++ implementation that is sound and does not rely on UB.
But nobody should do that, you allocate upfront.
I think a newer language, having the boreness of go, the compile speed and maybe comp time of zig and safety of rust will emerge, maybe with lisp syntax.
they are not humanly pilotable without computers. they are inherently unstable.
Now what about a 3-drivers taxi?
The answer is always the same, people hope to lower the driver cost, which I believe is significant for a 1-driver taxi.
You seem to be unaware of the existence switchboard operators (people redirecting calls to the correct person) were hundreds of thousands in the US alone at some point.
I think the crux is much more prosaic, as buried in the article. > I also don’t want to lose my job to a tangle of GPUs.
To put a GPTism, it’s not about the knowledge or status, it’s more about keeping their job and money.
And that can only be answered by policies, and imo by UBI. So votes if you can people, protest otherwise, discuss, debate, lobby with your friends, families acquitances.