NN88

Snowden really doesn't know as much as he claims to. Not to mention he's careless and the he exposed legitimate intelligence operations on foreign countries

NN88··on FBI official: It’s America’s choice whether we want to be spied on

To be honest, nothing bad has happened...yet.

NN88··on Modern art was CIA 'weapon' (1995)

This is my favorite cold war story

NN88··on We should call out Snowdens leaks having nothing to do with domestic policy

Its apparently not based on you wanting things to get done either

NN88··on We should call out Snowdens leaks having nothing to do with domestic policy

OK, so what NSA action do you support?

You keep using this word "immoral" yet i'm sure you'd rather the US to have the intelligence penetration of a banana republic.

NN88··on We should call out Snowdens leaks having nothing to do with domestic policy

Morality doesn't extend when everyone doesn't honor the same rules.

NN88··on CIA Director John Brennan emails

chart wikileaks' leaks since Russia threatened them at the end of 2010 and tell me you don't see a trend there

NN88··on CIA Director John Brennan emails

Its anti-Western because it leaves out China and Russia...reading that theory makes a lot more sense now.

Any PR victory Moscow can prop against the US hegemony is a win to them.

This is straight out of the Cold War PR battle.

NN88··on CIA Director John Brennan emails

It just hit me...they leaked TPP...when was the last time a non-Western agreement got leaked?

NN88··on CIA Director John Brennan emails

The Saudi leaks were sunni.

Russia is anti Saudi because of oil

Pay attention.

They're being co-opted:

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-10-16/saudi-arabi...

NN88··on CIA Director John Brennan emails

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/3pobtq/is_russi...

NN88··on CIA Director John Brennan emails

former intelligence analysts have suggested this.

The USGovt would never admit this because it might backfire as merely attacking a leaker, whose leaks are legitimate.

But the fact is, Wikileaks has to be judged on what they're not leaking.

NN88··on CIA Director John Brennan emails

If this is the case, they can't claim to be objective.

NN88··on CIA Director John Brennan emails

Its hard to prove because it would be interpreted as just attacking a leaker.

The USGovt has to be sensitive to the fact that the leaks are real information. But its far more nuanced to prove that WIKILEAKS is just pushing an anti-USA/NATO view.

Look at the Saudi Arabia leaks in light of the fact they're in a price war with Russia right now.

You won't see an Iranian leak on WIKILEAKS..and you haven't.

NN88··on CIA Director John Brennan emails

Why? Its obvious why at this point.

* Theres a theory that WIKILEAKS has been a FSB front since 2010: *

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/3pobtq/is_russi...

They haven't posted a SINGLE ANTI-Russian document since they threatened to leak documents in 2010

This is ONLY about Embarrassing the West.

At first I was skeptical, now i'm fully convinced that Assange and crew are TOTAL useful idiots.

NN88··on CIA Director John Brennan emails

Not an excuse. Read the link.

In 2010, they claimed to have a massive cache of information.