1,726 karma · joined August 3, 2011
The best part
You did it wrong. You need to micro-dose psilocybe shrooms over the course of ~30 days.
I would say that if it wasn't a pattern. So let's not pretend they're not cheaters. Call them out.
For example, former President Medvedev owns vineyards in Tuscany. The spokesperson Peskov’s daughter, Liza, owns penthouses in Paris with views of the Champs-Élysées. Many officials have moved their wealth abroad, including to the United States. A former mayor of Khabarovsk, a key city near the Chinese border, left Russia, purchased multiple properties in California, and is frequently spotted at a well-known banya in San Francisco.
The list goes on.
Ordinary citizens see this happening and are increasingly determined to avoid mandatory military drafts—just as it’s currently happening in Ukraine.
It's not a pleasure to work with.
I know quite a few programming languages, ~20 years of software development career. And React is the worst tech.
Don't get me wrong, but I wrote a lot of React code at work, and used it for personal projects (for example: make210.com)
But every time you touch React you're getting this distinctive "meh" flavor that tells you - oh yea, baby, it's because you're dealing with React.
WOW!
The same for job interviews. I did a lot of technical interviews in the past as interviewer (hundreds) for Software Engineer positions (and still help companies to hire sometimes, as independent interviewer).
There is insane amount of cheating. I'd say at least 30% in normal companies are cheaters, and 50% and more in FAANG. I can prove it, in private groups, and forums people share tech assignments. And very large number of these people use some kind of assistance while interviewing.
It's interesting to see how sometimes questions that are intentionally sophisticated are getting solved in a few minutes the best way they can be solved. I see this over and over.
It would be nice to have some sort of [landing] page for non-tech-savvy folks, so they understand it easier!
I love everything about this blog post and the software application.
I am happy I was able to exchange it for the "permanent changes" that made me back alive. I won't hesitate to do it again (have to admit I don't need it know, I'm in peace).
> obsessing about where to source drugs
It's one of the things I avoid, because sourcing is dangerous. Everything is contam now, even weed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehvIkZCZmzA. So "sourcing" and "drugs" are not the words from my vocabulary.
1000-year-old medicine I call it, that nature provides, ideally unprocessed (see /r/herbalism for safe-for-work examples).
Also, try to read the book I mentioned if you have time, it's in the very beginning (first 10% of it will answer most/all of your questions).
I've learnt the hard way that there are protocols from getting back on your feet from the shittiest shit in your life. There are communities of people with MUCH SEVERE problems.
It's also in books, read "PSYCHEDELIC OUTLAWS: The Movement Revolutionizing Modern Medicine" by Joanna Kempner. (there is also audiobook). There are communities, really really good communities that will help you to get back on your feet again, quickly, no b/s (I'm a bit hesitant to share the links, but you can always reach out). This really works, verified.
If you're suicidal, call 988. Also, I can send you a link to a protocol that helped many people with a very good reviews. I discovered it by accident, and there is a community of people who implemented that. Once you have all the things, the help is so quick, in a week you gonna enjoy life again.
It's speed of light in vacuum, Planck constant, Elementary Charge, and so on:
Speed of light in vacuum:
299792458.077272104522039393212883 Obtained
299792458(fixed) CODATA 2022
Planck constant:
6.6260686392218445411837981460499 * 10^(-34) Obtained
6.62606896(33) * 10^(-34) CODATA 2006
etc.
If you think about games, there is handful of them for blind and visually impaired players. But things got more interesting when keyboard is your screen.
I think I don't need a plan or virtual desktop. I just say "no" if it doesn't work for me. Unless I am really desperate, I do not share.
It's pretty obvious it's the same "defense" system as AK-47. While it's easy to justify, it will be used, highly likely, to kill people.
I don't have issues to show the screen to a friend of mine. Or showing the screen of a work computer to a colleague. However, demoing the whole screen is violation of privacy. Please don't do that, unless you grant VNC access to a machine with a set of popular tools, code editors, etc.
How about reverse bug squash? Interviewer shares the screen with all his/her private info, notes, tabs, development environment settings, shell command history (with maybe autosuggestions turned on), and the interviewee needs to guide the interviewer towards finding the bug?