1,983 karma · joined January 2, 2017
The key is to take a risk early in the game to break the bot's exponential growth with an attack. Then even the hardest difficultly becomes easy. It's interesting how sudden and aggressive that growth is.
Another hypothesis is that you are taking other steps such as searching for that topic so that you can send something to your wife those extra steps might be enabling tracking.
This, on the other hand, is pretty clever with the recursion reference. Sometimes I forget that YC was a wild idea at its time too, aiming to realize other wild ideas. Thanks for sharing.
The unhappiness comes from the fact that people want to rely on a service, even if it's free. It would make sense if this was a change for the sake of resources or paid user experience. This is for neither, just a tiny push for people to pay or leave. Ironically, It may make me want to stop paying because having all the conversations in one place is nice if I take the hobby slacks elsewhere
And to some Americans' surprise, not everywhere is like that. When you build your cities around cars, no other mode of transportation can thrive. Over a century of sprawl and road widening can't have an overnight fix.
Uber and his ministry were looking at creating a regulatory framework for ride-sharing. The BBC frames this as Macron ignoring illegal activity. I think from Macron's perspective Uber's activity was "unregulated" not "illegal". That's a healthy approach towards change. Otherwise we can't renew our laws.
The BBC's view of how politicians and innovators should interact seems to be too narrow. I think Macron can be a role model actually.
also yes Travis was a controversial figure, that seems beside the point. Stuff he did elsewhere don't seem to matter here.
Long story short, the decision makers live in a small bubble that tells them what they want to hear
> This was the first time when 75% of the class was cheating way beyond the pale for half a semester
I know people who are on school for immigration reasons. Specially with computer science, there is so much nonsense that sometimes people must work through. This doesn't mean they don't have integrity.
The author says they sympathize with students. But do they really? Making the students write a humiliating "academic integrity essay" is not engagement. It's forcing someone to smile and then boasting that they have a good time.
I am forever grateful for my bachelor's. Not because they thought us a lot, actually the opposite. I happened to be in a unique situation in which course work was practically non-existent.
It was marvelous! As a 19 year old I was just learning to have adult social experiences and the school really allowed me to do that. The classes were not about pass or fail. They were about being in an environment and finding what's interesting within it. I know it sounds like this sort of thing will create terrible candidates for FAANG, and maybe so (not in our case), but perhaps it could also avoid the need to question the integrity of a teenager.