CS-SC251c in the EU.
1,065 karma · joined February 26, 2022
In which country are those not priority 2 and priority 1 messages? Or is a non-pilot flying is a different problem depending on the country?
Switching to something else is not as easy as buying a new modem for most normal people.
I don't use apple, but I do appreciate the suffering of limited choice their users endure for the effect of higher diversity. Thank you, iphone users.
Thanks for mentioning it, I missed the link to part 2.
I don't think I can see the connection between the two parts though. Part 1 places people on two axis "cares" and "conflicts", with the largest number high on "cares" and low on "conflict". It seemed high on "cares" is desirable, and that getting more people to voice their oppinions (higher on "conflict") would be an improvement.
Part 2 puts people on a single axis of how likely they are going to embed clean-up changes in their PRs. This is unlikely to be the "conflict" axis from part 1. If it is the "cares" axis, 75% would already show the desired behavior, with not much untapped potential remaining. Part 2 then continues by asking people about their oppinions. With most people on the lower half of the part 1 "conflict" axis it is surprising that everyone does even have an oppinion.
I'll place myself high on the "conflict" axis with this: Clean-up should not be hidden in other PRs. It increases time needed for review and risk for collisions. It also increases the effort required for an analysis of the history in a distant future. Separate PRs for clean-up.
Much easier to replace the sun by some other source of EM-waves of suitable wave length and put it into a freezer, below the temperature of the cell.
How does the wave poking some electron to a higher state remember the temperature of its source?
For a one of its kind deployment it would probably not matter. However, deploying to multiple targets using the same basic approach would allow all of them to be found once one was discovered. With some mildly confsing but different scripting for each target systematic detection of others becomes more difficult.
There doesn't even seem to be much speech of the companies running the platforms on their own platforms. All they do is quote their users.
A kind of online-tool that collects the sources to build some relevant distributions, a web front-end to show a random piece of code (filtered by language, probability to show inreasing by less-recently/frequently/qualified viewed) to a volunteering visitor to review. The reviewer leaves a self assesment about their own skills (feed back into selection probability) and any potential findings. Tool-staff double-checks findings (so that the tool does not create too much noise) and forwards to the original authors (bugs) or elsewhere (backdoors).
A bit like wikipedias show random page.
A deviation of 6 minutes was reached and fixed in 2018.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/04/european-grid-di...
I have no idea if that kind of strategy is applied elsewhere in the world.
During some hours of the night increase/decrease the frequency to let the "clocks" run faster/slower, so they gradually adjust for the next day.
That could even be stretched out over multiple days, maybe two weeks, which would it make much easier for humans to adjust, too.
An alternative could be to let the user do the math, and change it to "Please start cooking in 3h27min for 12min at 600W".
Why did they implement a fully-featured backdoor and attempted to hide the way it is deployed, instead of deploying something innocent-looking that might as well be a bug if detected?
These must have been conscious decisions. The reasons might provide a hint what the goals might have been.
But even with everything disabled (predictive text, spell checker (as may be obvious reading this), ...), it does cause network traffic.
Any login-data ever used can now be considered leaked. Great.
It would need half the turbines to turn the other way around to have left/right wings, doubling tooling cost for production.
And it would need a runway of appropriate width, but maybe they could be mounted at significant v-shape.
Return trip not on the ground. The fuselage, engines, ... would still be massive, but with a set of small "normal" wings.
Direct-to-tower delivery. Removes the need for transport on the ground for the last miles and the need for a crane.
The headline is just making fun of theory and practice. If some is a murder expert, is that some one who understands murder or someone highly qualified to kill people?
Therefore, the title is about a "dishonesty expert" matching the practice, not about a "honesty expert", which could be replaced by any other field.
Replacing parts is not repairing from that point of view, even if at a macroscopic level it returns something back to working condition.
It doesn't like to talk about concepts, confusing them with conception (biology).