We recently migrated from Heroku Postgres to Crunchy Bridge and can totally recommend it. So maybe set up your new database there instead.
73 karma · joined June 22, 2012
We recently migrated from Heroku Postgres to Crunchy Bridge and can totally recommend it. So maybe set up your new database there instead.
We wanted small to medium size SaaS founders (like us) to be able to send targeted emails to their ussrs based on their behavior. The right message at the right time instead of a stupid stream of irrelevant content.
After building the product on the side for quite a while, we launched in late 2019 with and allowed our customers track key usage metrics for their individual users.
However, we quickly realized that this doesn't cut it for most SaaS businesses (especially B2B). More often than not, a company account has many users of different roles, and in some cases a user can even be part of many companies.
It was a pain to manage these relationships in Userlist and almost all other email automation tools we looked at.
Today, this changed for Userlist, though. We just launched company account support in Userlist.
Our data model allows tracking users, companies, and relationships between them. You can model one-to-one, one-to-many, and many-to-many relationships and even track relationship properties (like the user's role in a company) or company events (like billing events).
Our automation campaigns allows you to send messages to users (or subsets of users) based on things that happen in the companies they're part of.
Ultimately, we hope this allows SaaS business to send less, but more relevant emails to their users.
Are you as excited about this as we are? We're looking forward to hear what you think about our solution to this problem.
- Benedikt & Jane
P.S. We've been looking for that "what makes you better than X" argument — and we hope we finally found it. Maybe that's how our small team can outperform VC-funded tools? Fingers crossed :D
I'd probably bill Metallica a lot more than that… ;)
My tip to improving your design skills: Try to replicate designs you like. Pick one and analyze every pixel (literally!) of it and try to build it yourself. The techniques you learn in the process make it easier to come up with a nice design of your own eventually.
It's a great exercise and helped me a lot in the past.
Based on my past experience the storage limits are well over the actual needs. It usually only grows when bands have a lot of photos on their website. At the moment I'm implying that a band with a lot of photos has been around for quite some time and is probably also somewhat successful by then, so they'd have to choose a larger plan anyways (because of increased traffic).
Yearly plans is definitely a thing I'm going to add in the future. :)
Thanks for the feedback, though! I'll try to rephrase it without losing the gist of it :)
I'm currently segmenting by visitors/day as it seems to be the only way to separate bands into the different plans based on their popularity and success. It's also directly bound to the costs on my side (more traffic -> more server resources).
I'm happy to hear suggestions on how to make sure a band making tons of money doesn't end up on the smallest plan, as well as costs for infrastructure not bankrupting me. :)
I hope this screenshot helps to clarify things a bit http://drif.tt/1KfpfoI :)
Thanks so much for the nice comments. I'm glad my story inspired some of you :)
If you have specific questions about anything or would like some more details about any part of the story, please let me know. I'll happily answer them.