586 karma · joined January 12, 2016
>With a technology that is extremely damaging to the entire planet for no reason…
Not all blockchains are based on PoW. If you actually read even a brief summary of the basics of crypto you’d know this since it’s mentioned nearly everywhere these days. It seems you are therefore either ignorant on what you speak, or are willfully misleading people to fit your own narrative.
>…come away with the opinion that it's junk tech that roasts the planet, both because it's true and because climate change is a very serious problem.
You’re stating opinions as facts and being far more intellectually dishonest and misleading than any crypto native I’ve seen on here.
> If the end result is that cryptocurrency discourse is effectively run out of HN…
You and you alone don’t get to decide or arbiter what HN is used for or who it is used by. This is gate keeping trash that erodes intellectual debate and discourse into an echo chamber of more curmudgeonly people patting each other’s curmudgeonly backs.
> Like it or not, HN is an important forum. People with a fair amount of influence come here.
HN is an important forum full of important people. On this we agree. My opinion, then, is we should probably be open to discussing new technologies, difficult topics, and unsavory ideas as these are the types of conversation from whence innovation springs. Nobody ever got smarter debating which JavaScript framework is the new hotness on the front page of HN.
> …similar to phrenology or eugenics…
Eugenics is worth discussing as it will once again become a cultural hotbed debate as we move into an era of designer genetics. I find it mostly amusing that you punctuate your point about quelling curiosity by dismissing away another topic that requires thick skin and intellectual rigor to properly discuss and even lump these in with phrenology. This is kind of like saying “discussions of meteorology, astronomy, and astrology should be banned.” One of these things is not like the other…
Based on this comment alone, I’d say you also probably like burning books.
Needless to say, it's that third browser I'm trying that interests me most.
I’d be interested to know your general age group.
I have a theory that skeumorphism is a cross-generational design trend that serves a purpose to articulate a radical new technological paradigm in a language that makes sense to people that have never experienced it (i.e. A radio app that looks like an actual radio because that’s what everyone grew up using). I think once people are fully immersed and familiar with the tech, though, skeumorphism is limiting and ugly. We don’t need radio apps that look like radios anymore because everyone should now know how digital interfaces work. We can abstract away dials and knobs and make better use of the space for something that fits better with the constraints of a screen rather than the constraints of the physical world. This harkens back to the old discussions around the save icon and how there is an entire generation clicking an abstract symbol that holds no meaning to them while the generation prior comfortably recognized this symbol as “equivalent to archiving on my floppy disks.” Skeumorphism is really only intuitive to the first generation. Everyone that comes after just sees another (possibly ugly) abstraction that makes just as much sense as the next one. Screens don’t need metal dials, plush felts, and eye-popping gauges where a simple shadow would otherwise suffice.
I mean this with no disrespect. We all have our own sense of aesthetic. Just a thought I’ve been ruminating on. Personally I find neumorphism [1] to be a pleasing blend of the positives of both skeumorphism and flat design and I hope to see more of it going forward.
[1] https://uxplanet.org/neomorphism-the-hottest-design-trend-in...
Not affiliated, but perhaps give them a try? There’s some immensely interesting projects in the space coming out these days.
The parent comment’s point would seem to be that this person is making a claim that should be refutable with evidence. But the evidence is Facebook’s own data supporting her claim so they can’t do that. Instead, they diminish her credibility. It’s not “smearing” in the sense of calling her a baby eater, but it is a credentials fallacy meant to make people dismiss her claims regardless of validity.
[0] https://bluishcoder.co.nz/2016/08/18/using-freenet-over-tor....
https://www.theverge.com/2021/6/7/22522889/apple-facetime-an...
Isn’t that exactly what crypto is?
It’s also worth noting that Spotify can act as a remote for its own service across devices. So you can start a song playing on your phone and direct the output over AirPlay and then just interface with that session using the desktop client.
Sarcasm and condescension do nothing to drive the conversation forward and really just mask your own ignorance to solving the problem as well. If a solution already existed to the degree that it was common knowledge in public forums then I guess there wouldn’t be a problem would there?
The fact that massive divisions of companies like Alphabet (Calico) are dedicated to solving these problems seems to indicate that not all of us are deathists satisfied to recuse ourselves to mortality on the basis of some flimsy naturalistic fallacy.
Edit: Typo, changed our to are
Technologies: Python, shell scripting across multiple languages and environments, lots of hardware experience in diagnostics and repair, component level repair and modification, learning JS and C++ (currently have basic experience with both); experienced red teaming with applicable real world knowledge of such things like BurpSuite, Metasploit (with some custom shell code), Nessus/Nexpose, etc
I also have a decent amount of experience with UI/UX and have used Figma, Sketch, Framer, and XD extensively for mock-up and prototyping work for both personal and some professional projects.
Resume: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MYQLWjm7n5vFstgLg-6oDaJllL7... (PDF)
Email: scratchfive@hey.com
Fast learner, self motivated, love challenging problems that really stretch my knowledge. If I had to point to a weakness it’s that I’m mostly self-taught with very little regard given to industry lingo and acronyms. I can learn, but will need some plain English explanations of what you want to start with. I’m a DIY type with lots of gumption.
Edit: Typo