I've found that most small customers will open their wallets if you can clearly show value and tie it to outcomes.
79 karma · joined December 17, 2019
I've found that most small customers will open their wallets if you can clearly show value and tie it to outcomes.
But, if those small firms want to get bigger and capture the value they help create, hourly billing sends the wrong message. That's where this list truly hits home.
It's not you. It's the stereotypical role. Extremely manual with minimal thought needed to perform the job to be done.
Yet when you flip the script and prize profits, it requires you to justify every one of them and look for ways to make your business work at the profit level you've chosen to target.
You'll have to justify every hire, every recurring expense, and either cut them or find replacements. The end result is a healthier business.
This won't happen overnight but it will work if you're diligent. It's also an excellent path toward innovation - creating new ways to achieve more with less.
Regarding his risks on going it solo, you're spot on! In his AMA he called out attempting to hire but pulled back afterwards. I'm assuming it was a poor hire so I'd focus on learning what went wrong and trying it again. Even at just a couple employees, he could grow while preserving his massive profit margin and gain the ability to take time away or weather an illness or family mishaps.
He even mentioned he maintains a full-time job to hedge his bets. If he's keeping it because he wants benefits, I'd think it would make more sense to invest in those himself. If he's keeping it because the work is minimal and the reward (pay) is high enough to offset the revenue from what X number of additional clients would generate, I'd say that could make sense as well. Very specific circumstances.
When our youngest was 13, she decided to get a job but feared she was no longer qualified. Fast forward 4 months and she's a critical employee in a 30+ person software startup transitioning away from a design agency. The skills that come natural to her have opened doors she never felt would open... definitely not that fast!
But what I failed to share will hopefully clear up the confusion. They didn't call that out during the hiring process. They talked themselves up as if they could succeed single-handedly. It wasn't shared until they were failing to show progress and then it became an excuse. It wasn't possible to give (or hire) them a team. In the end, the person was let go to find a bigger company with the resources and capacity they would need to succeed. No hard feelings... just not a fit.
Does that clear everything up?
My motivation here was to share what I've learned. To benefit from my mistakes. Sidestep my missteps.
Ideas are great and necessary, but even great ones are only valuable if they can be acted upon. In a small business, an ideas-only person will have trouble succeeding. Being able to also (at least) kickstart the effort is critical.
I wasn't attempting to dismiss leadership in any way, shape, or form. Merely calling out the difference between personally "doing" (in the sense of small business) versus the "orchestrating" that is more typical in a larger company.
I've worked in both and have seen how people that spent their career in a large company may struggle in a small business setting. No shame. Just a (often overlooked) distinction.
That's why I was quick to call out that ideas have little true value without execution.
Ideas are born and die every day. We're naturally creative but we also (generally speaking) don't tend to follow-through. That's the real and hard part.
Why would influencers on Twitter seek to rebuild on Clubhouse when a viable alternative exists (or will)?! Outside of the timing which will be a moot point shortly...
Newsletter - The Service Zealot (https://servicezealot.com), a weekly advice column for service business operators fed up with the status quo.
At least, that is what social media and business books love to portray. Yet they do little to highlight the dark side.