I have only watched a handful of episodes of the Huberman podcast, but I really appreciated that they have an actionable science-based takeway to help with the area you want to focus on.
737 karma · joined August 8, 2023
I have only watched a handful of episodes of the Huberman podcast, but I really appreciated that they have an actionable science-based takeway to help with the area you want to focus on.
"There are definitely large tech companies that would rather not have to try to compete with open source, so they're creating fear of AI leading to human extinction," he told the news outlet. "It's been a weapon for lobbyists to argue for legislation that would be very damaging to the open-source community."
https://www.businessinsider.com/andrew-ng-google-brain-big-t...
10-15 years ago, when I had a lot more free time, I used to put CyanogenMod on my phones and play around with that.
Are there any good open source mobile OS around these days?
So while I accept it to the extent that I still post here, I feel like 'don't worry about it' completely misses the point of 'it'. It exists specifically for you to worry about.
While we all make necessary and unavoidable judgements, the explicit nature of being judged and acting as a judge on social media lends itself to being inauthentic and narcissistic.
Hans-Georg Moeller has an excellent YouTube channel called Carefree Wandering. There several very good episodes on authenticity and social media.
For what it's worth he also comes across as a really nice guy.
I have trouble imagining any of the vapid narcissists of today's stardom being able to pull something like that off.
Who would be the most likely candidate?
Would someone be kind enough to offer a summary for dummies?
There are several resources I wasn't familiar with, but the brutalist report stood out at a quick glance. I have a soft spot for austere web pages and that one is just right.
"If you deleted a whole bunch of papers from across the literature, though, that would really make a difference, and we’d have to rebuild big parts of the field from the ground up. Right?
No, not really. We did delete those papers, and nothing much happened. In 2015, a big team of researchers tried to redo 100 psychology studies, and about 60% failed to replicate.
This finding made big waves and headlines, and it's already been cited nearly 8,000 times.
But the next time someone brings it up, ask them to name as many of the 100 studies as they can. My bet is they top out at zero. I'm basically at zero myself, and I've written about that study at length. (I asked a few of my colleagues in case I'm just uniquely stupid, and their answers were: 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, and 3.)" https://www.experimental-history.com/p/im-so-sorry-for-psych...
If so I apologize.
I'd always assumed "Your mother was a hamster and your father stank of elderberries" was just a meaningless bit of Monty Python absurdity.
When my wife explained to the kids that meant your mom is a slut and your dad is a drunk I was flabbergasted. I had never reevaluated that iconic insult from my initial ignorant teenage assumptions.
My favorite anecdote is the scientist who carried arround and shook a bottle for two weeks to distill the water for experiments in finding when water boiled. When the water exploded after heating he found that not only did he not know when water boiled, but now he wasn't even sure what boiling was.
On the (rare) occasion I find it useful to avoid this very normal tendency I ask myself if it would make sense to apply the same framing to the output of an AI image generator.
It turned out to be a lot of handwaving to come to the obvious conclusion that most crimes are more likely to occur in some areas than others, along with the offender's residence.
It was taught by a former FBI agent, and his academic acumen was very...disillusioning.