279 karma · joined September 13, 2009
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/dsporter; my proof: https://keybase.io/dsporter/sigs/pV4cfrY-7Jk69s-cPgasBBqciu-Q6t82ox4CkY02Lws ]
It’s not false. The first quote is about asymmetric, and the latter is about symmetric.
It is possible for employers to use alternative methods. IRS Pub. 15-T sec. 6 has details on common alternatives and constraints.
I have no idea to what extent employers support any of these alternative methods. I imagine it's limited to employers where much of their workforce is overwithheld using the standard methods. One example might be a school district where teachers are only paid when in session.
This is not correct. It's calculated per pay period. Please see IRS Publication 15 and 15-T.
No.
Many intentionally run without mitigations.
DoH (ietf rfc 8484) recommends http/2 as a minimum, http/3 is a valid DoH transport.
> which is less efficient
What kind of efficiency are you referencing? This is not a clear cut issue.
> UDP-based QUIC (aka http/3)
The linked rfc uses only the quic transport, not http/3.
https://awealthofcommonsense.com/2020/12/what-if-you-only-in...
A third-party used to maintain some relevant content on tinydns.org. They let the domain lapse around 2017, and whatever is there now is trash.
UC filed seven months earlier:
https://genotopia.scienceblog.com/573/a-whig-history-of-cris...