178 karma · joined April 30, 2017
As bad as EU is, eventually they will get along just fine...or a least just as United States of America do.
Not sure about others but personally the yard, larger home, parking etc are a huge quality of life boost. I can sacrifice for a while, but eventually need to enjoy life a bit.
50%+1 just doesn't seem right. These are life-changing decisions and there needs to be a general consensus.
It will never make me miserable since I rarely post and don't care about "likes"
Let's start fresh:
1. Vaccines apparently are not mandatory. You can vaccinate your child or not.
2. Someone that's telling parents not to vaccinate, shouldn't be going to jail, because he's not doing anything illegal (see point 1).
3. The state should make vaccines mandatory first, which IMO is the correct choice.
There's no FUD or anti-vaccine thing, simply saying that as long as vaccines are optional, people should not go to jail for saying don't vaccinate.
Why hasn't the government made it mandatory then (IMO it should be) ?
My point still stands. If it was so ironclad, it would illegal to refuse to vaccinate. Refuse to "care" about your child and you go to jail and lose the child Yet, you can refuse to vaccinate him/her and suffer no consequences. So you have a choice. If I tell you that you do not have to vaccinate, why should I be sued or jailed?
Which one should we sue? Slippery slope. In the end no one was forced anyone not to vaccinate the kids.
If vaccines are made mandatory then the state can fine/jail the parents and do them even if the parents chose not to
In reality, most of the time it's best not to see or hear anything.
If it materializes, I'm sure you'll set you priorities straight
Or you smuggle a persecuted across the US border it might still be illegal for you but you're breaking the law for a humanitarian reason. However, if you charge $5000 a person, any person from MS-13 to Isis to day laborers bring your toothbrush
I meant Facebook. If they all stopped their UK services for a few days, they /us might win. FB + Google want to spy on us to sell ads, but I doubt they want the gov to do so. So we have a common enemy.
The post I replied suggested that Italy is not safe because of Mafia. Yeah, Salvatore Riina did go into terror to force the state to settle some 20+ years ago, but how many people not related to their business were killed vs mafiosi? Things happen. People fall out of their beds too. USA and other countries have their own problems.
My point was that Italy is to be considered dangerous for tourists because of the mafia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intention...
What would happen? Would the government back down? No doubt if Google, Microsoft and Google joined it would be easier. China wouldn't care but UK is different politically and much smaller to have it's own replacements.
Donating has its risks, after all there's a reason we have two, when only one does the job. I know a person who donated one kidney to his son and was told to essentially change his lifestyle at least when it came to physical work.
Until people that OK'd, knew and /or executed a certain action go to jail, nothing will change. Lawyer fees and fines now are a tiny cost of doing business for big corps.
He's probably worth more to a company if he works in marketing. What a brilliant way to market himself.
Why do people still argue that? It makes no sense to me, even as a non-lawyer (but I've watched People's Court :))
Otherwise El Chapo could be arguing the same, I believe in people's rights to use drugs so I'm breaking every law in the books and making billions "while fighting for their rights"
90% for 5 months? Any specific situation or just prefer it that way?
Personally, I'd prefer to get out of the home /office, stretch, clear my head and eat the (kinda) old fashion way. Everyone has the same 24 hours...
No taxes if a company has an employee that makes at least x00% of minimum wage for every, say $500K of worth. So your parents leave you a company that has a $20mm value and you have 40 employees that average $35,000 a year, you pay no inheritance taxes. Of course you need you'd to set a reasonable timeable to discourage cheating, otherwise they'd sell /fire 50% as soon as the x year timeline expires.
Personally I think that you earned your money, paid taxes on it and your kids shouldn't be being more than half (at least on paper, before scores of lawyers and accountants devise shelters.)
Your own kids are different, now as you go down the family free... Soon enough or maybe even now, the Kennedys, can marry each other in the church and without any genetic penalty. So Joe's money could be funding both sides of the family...