17,375 karma · joined June 9, 2009
YouTube et al. could just as easily decide that discussion of natural immunity from prior infection is also "dangerous" (it might discourage vaccination) and ban it.
In our software group, we were constantly battling with management that wanted to start to look at software development as a factory-like process, and to apply factory QA processes.
Digging a tunnel would have to deal with deep earth concerns, such as how to deal with the core, what to do with the removed material, etc.
We need a new Linus to create a viable, competitive alternative in the mobile space. Android is a good starting point, but so far no de-Googled Android (what I call Undroid) alternatives seem that viable.
There's validity in working around or gaming systems so that a company has a chance of growing and thriving. The tactics used (contractors instead of employees, etc.) are perfectly legal. People are getting paid per an agreement, and they spend their income in their country/society, which disperses the benefits. A startup saddled with year (or two) long maternity leave and other such extreme requirements would make the risk too high.
These regulations create a regulatory capture situation where only large, established, or very well financed businesses can survive. Kudos to the agile and clever startups that find ways to make it, regardless. One should be on the side of the people, not the system.
A cohesive home with both the mother and father present, where moral values are taught, is more effective than a sad, government-run program.
I advise this sincerely, as I did it for 10 years, and enjoyed it a lot. However, I got myself back "above ground" and into systems and apps again, because my inclination is actually exactly the opposite of yours: "I could care less about “making” things; all I care about is “fixing” things".
Over time, although the gratification of getting things to work remained, I grew tired of FIO every. single. day. I longed to again design and create solutions -- to "make" things. Different strokes for different folks. Best of luck to you.
These companies should put the screws to California if they're forced to comply, and charge lots more here than in free states. It might hurt their business in CA, but that's the case anyway (by design per the legislature's goal). Maybe just pull out altogether, and only serve free states.
Heat or alage aren't impossible, but it sure does seem odd.
I'd be fine if the fine print in the EULA provides a guarantee that the feature scans content solely for generating previews, and that M$ keeps no copy of it, etc....But, I'm sure I'd go blind looking for such text in the EULA.
I don't see the harm in recognizing our superior differences; in fact, it's as important as recognizing our similarities and common bonds.
https://thehill.com/policy/international/392636-schumer-on-c...
My fun in such a meeting would be ridiculing the silly tech. I bet it'll be a hit, nonetheless.
He acknowledges its existence, but doesn't have artifacts from it. As I recall, the box (as software was packaged then) had a large tomato on it (his company was Software Garden).